18F-FDG PET in children with lymphomas

被引:75
|
作者
Depas, G [1 ]
De Barsy, C
Jerusalem, G
Hoyoux, C
Dresse, MF
Fassotte, MF
Paquet, N
Foidart, J
Rigo, P
Hustinx, R
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Div Nucl Med, Liege, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp, Div Med Oncol, Liege, Belgium
[3] CHR Citadelle, Div Pediat Hematol & Oncol, Liege, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp, Div Hematol, Liege, Belgium
[5] Hop Hotel Dieu, Div Nucl Med, Levis, PQ, Canada
关键词
F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose; positron emission tomography; child; lymphoma; oncology;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-004-1604-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the performance of positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) in children with lymphomas, at various stages of their disease. Methods: Twenty-eight children (mean age 12.5 years, 14 girls, 14 boys) with Hodgkin's disease (HD, n=17) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL, n= 11) were evaluated. Patients were investigated at initial staging (n=19), early in the course of treatment (n=19), at the end of treatment (n=16) and during long-term follow-up (n=19). A total of 113 whole-body PET studies were performed on dedicated scanners. PET results were compared with the results of conventional methods (CMs) such as physical examination, laboratory studies, chest X-rays, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and bone scan when available. Results: At initial evaluation (group 1), PET changed the disease stage and treatment in 10.5% of the cases. In early evaluation of the response to treatment (group 2), PET failed to predict two relapses and one incomplete response to treatment. In this group, however, PET did not show any false positive results. There were only 4/75 false positive results for PET among patients studied at the end of treatment (group 3, specificity 94%) or during the systematic follow-up (group 4, specificity 95%), as compared with 27/75 for CMs (specificity 54% and 66%, respectively). Conclusion: F-18-FDG-PET is a useful tool for evaluating children with lymphomas. Large prospective studies are needed to appreciate its real impact on patient management.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 38
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 18F-FDG PET in children with lymphomas
    Gisele Depas
    Caroline De Barsy
    Guy Jerusalem
    Claire Hoyoux
    Marie-Françoise Dresse
    Marie-France Fassotte
    Nancy Paquet
    Jacqueline Foidart
    Pierre Rigo
    Roland Hustinx
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2005, 32 : 31 - 38
  • [2] 18F-FDG PET in Pediatric Lymphomas: A Comparison with Conventional Imaging
    Lopci, Egesta
    Burnelli, Roberta
    Ambrosini, Valentina
    Nanni, Cristina
    Castellucci, Paolo
    Biassoni, Lorenzo
    Rubello, Domenico
    Fanti, Stefano
    CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS, 2008, 23 (06) : 681 - 689
  • [3] Staging, response to therapy, and restaging of lymphomas with 18F-FDG PET
    Altamirano, Javier
    Esparza, Jorge Reyes
    Salazar, Jaime de la Garza
    Calvo, Pedro Sobrevilla
    Vera, Silvia Rivas
    Revelo, Juan Ramon Chalapud
    Estrada, Gisela
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (01) : 69 - 77
  • [4] Interim 18F-FDG PET-CT In The Prediction Of Outcome In Children with FDG Avid Extra Nodal Lymphomas
    Abbas, Hadeer
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 63
  • [5] Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG SPECT for lung nodules
    Burt, RW
    Witt, RM
    Das, S
    Oppenheim, BE
    Schauwecker, DS
    Siddiqui, AR
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1094 - 1094
  • [6] 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for children and adolescents
    Lassmann, Michael
    Eberlein, Uta
    Tosi, Giovanni
    Chiti, Arturo
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (07): : E243 - E244
  • [7] Imaging of malignant lymphomas with 18F-FDG coincidence detection PET (CoDe-PET).
    Hwang, KH
    Park, CH
    Kim, HC
    Kim, HS
    Yoon, SN
    Kim, S
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 41 (05) : 278P - 278P
  • [8] 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Assessing Response to Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
    Krause, Bernd J.
    Herrmann, Ken
    Wieder, Hinrich
    zum Bueschenfelde, Christian Meyer
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 : 89S - 96S
  • [9] The Performance of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detection of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
    Dong, M.
    Zhao, K.
    Zhao, J.
    Guan, Y.
    Liu, Z.
    Ruan, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 : S275 - S275
  • [10] 18F-FDG PET/MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of pituitary adenoma
    Wang, Hao
    Zhao, Xiaobin
    Zang, Jie
    Zhu, Zhaohui
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59