Measuring security in the built environment: Evaluating urban vulnerability in a human-scale urban form

被引:38
|
作者
Shach-Pinsly, Dalit [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion IIT, Fac Architecture & Town Planning, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Urban security; Crime prevention; GIS analysis; Evaluation; Measurement; Risk assessment; CRIME; CRIMINOLOGY; PRIVACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.022
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Designing secured urban spaces is one of the main ambitions of urban planners during the planning and design process. People usually travel by foot through safe routes and urban spaces in the built environment as they are perceived as safe areas, such as: lighted paths, walking on the livable side of a sidewalk instead of walking beside a sealed facade, or away from unsecured building entrances. The way people use and interact in their built environment involves their cognitive perception, which depends upon the urban fabric details. Therefore, planners and decision makers aimed in understanding the way the components of the built environment affect unsecured environments so as to assess the risks before design decisions are made. However, they lack new approaches and models with which to evaluate a qualitative sense of security that is understandable on a human-scale in the built environment. This research deals with this gap in information and measures one unmeasurable qualitative aspect of the built environment, the sense of security, in quantitative terms based on a geo-spatial system, and then relate it to human-scale urban form. The Security Rating Index (SRI) establishes a GIS-based, quantifiable system to identify and rate insecure urban spaces to be used by urban planners and city decision makers to evaluate and improve urban resilience. The system is based on measurements of urban elements that influence the sense of security in the built environment, and can be used to identify characteristics and hot spots of unsecured spaces in a city. The SRI is demonstrated on several case studies on different scales.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring human-scale urban form and its performance
    Long, Ying
    Ye, Yu
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 191
  • [2] Exploring Associations between the Built Environment and Cycling Behaviour around Urban Greenways from a Human-Scale Perspective
    Bai, Yiwei
    Bai, Yihang
    Wang, Ruoyu
    Yang, Tianren
    Song, Xinyao
    Bai, Bo
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (03)
  • [3] Security sensitivity index: evaluating urban vulnerability
    Shach-Pinsly, Dalit
    Ganor, Tamar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING, 2015, 168 (03) : 115 - 128
  • [4] Human-Scale Quantitative Analysis on Urban Road Intersections
    Shen, Zhiyong
    Shen, Zhiwei
    Luo, Xiao
    Tu, Meiting
    Liu, Xinghua
    [J]. CICTP 2021: ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, ENHANCED CONNECTION, 2021, : 1152 - 1160
  • [5] Urban form and livability: socioeconomic and built environment indicators
    Martino, Nicholas
    Girling, Cynthia
    Lu, Yuhao
    [J]. BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2021, 2 (01): : 220 - 243
  • [6] HUMAN-SCALE TECHNOLOGY - A NEW APPROACH TO SOLVING URBAN PROBLEMS
    HALLETT, SJ
    HESS, GA
    [J]. FUTURIST, 1982, 16 (03) : 26 - 31
  • [7] Measuring daily accessed street greenery: A human-scale approach for informing better urban planning practices
    Ye, Yu
    Richards, Daniel
    Lu, Yi
    Song, Xiaoping
    Zhuang, Yu
    Zeng, Wei
    Zhong, Teng
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 191
  • [8] The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health
    Frank, LD
    Engelke, PO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2001, 16 (02) : 202 - 218
  • [9] From walking buffers to active places: An activity-based approach to measure human-scale urban form
    Xu, JieLan
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 191
  • [10] Evaluating an Immersive Virtual Learning Environment for Learning How to Design in Human-Scale
    Sonmez, Orkun
    Sorguc, Arzu Gonenc
    [J]. ECAADE 2018: COMPUTING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW, VO 1, 2018, : 371 - 378