ADMINISTRATING PATENT LITIGATION

被引:0
|
作者
Sherkow, Jacob S. [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Law Sch, New York, NY USA
关键词
HATCH-WAXMAN; ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; LAW; SETTLEMENTS; POLICY; STANDARDS; AGENCIES; HOLDUP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Recent patent litigation reform efforts have focused on every branch of government Congress, the President, and the federal courts save the fourth: administrative agencies. Agencies, however, possess a variety of functions in patent litigation: they serve as "gatekeepers" to litigation in federal court; they provide scientific and technical expertise to patent disputes; they review patent litigation to fulfill their own mandates; and they serve, in several instances, as entirely alternative fora to federal litigation. Understanding administrative agencies' functions in managing or directing, i.e., "administrating," patent litigation sheds both descriptive and normative insight on several aspects of patent reform. These include several problems inherent in patent litigation generally, and ways of fixing them that focus less on the identities or characteristics of litigants and more on agencies' (and courts') institutional incentives. This Article synoptically describes the functions of administrative agencies in patent litigation, elucidates several problems with agencies' operation of those functions, and provides several cheap, easy, and politically viable solutions to better administrating patent litigation.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 269
页数:65
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PATENT LITIGATION
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1933, 15 (11): : 940 - 940
  • [2] VIEW ON PATENT LITIGATION AND ON PATENT SYSTEM
    WRIGHT, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1977, 59 (07): : 409 - 423
  • [3] The patent litigation protocol and the community patent
    Pagenberg, J
    [J]. IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT LAW, 2003, 34 (05): : 535 - 539
  • [4] Patent litigation strategies
    Hauff, CF
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 217 : U285 - U285
  • [5] Observations on Patent Litigation
    Jackson, Joseph R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1952, 34 (04): : 243 - 254
  • [6] Patent litigation in 1938
    Littell, N
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1939, 31 : 120 - 123
  • [7] Patent Litigation Insurance
    Duchene, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, 2017, 84 (02) : 631 - 660
  • [8] Avoiding patent litigation
    Milo, P
    [J]. EE-EVALUATION ENGINEERING, 2004, 43 (06): : 6 - 6
  • [9] PATENT LITIGATION IN CANADA
    BOCHNOVIC, J
    [J]. IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT LAW, 1983, 14 (01): : 60 - 84
  • [10] Patent litigation in Europe
    Katrin Cremers
    Max Ernicke
    Fabian Gaessler
    Dietmar Harhoff
    Christian Helmers
    Luke McDonagh
    Paula Schliessler
    Nicolas van Zeebroeck
    [J]. European Journal of Law and Economics, 2017, 44 : 1 - 44