共 50 条
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review
被引:29
|作者:
Correia-Melo, Fernanda S.
[1
]
Argolo, Felipe C.
[1
]
Araujo-de-Freitas, Lucas
[1
,2
]
Leal, Gustavo Carneiro
[1
]
Kapczinski, Flavio
[3
]
Lacerda, Acioly Luiz
[4
]
Quarantini, Lucas C.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Fed Bahia, Univ Hosp, Psychiat Serv, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Bahia, Postgrad Program Med & Hlth, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Psychiat, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Psychiat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源:
关键词:
tolerability;
S-(+)-ketamine;
treatment-resistant depression;
dissociative symptoms;
efficacy;
safety;
D-ASPARTATE ANTAGONIST;
TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION;
RACEMIC KETAMINE;
MAJOR DEPRESSION;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
TRIAL;
DISORDERS;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
METAANALYSIS;
IMPAIRMENT;
D O I:
10.2147/NDT.S135623
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: This study evaluated efficacy and safety of intravenous subanesthetic doses of esketamine using an administration time of 10 minutes in patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who met the inclusion criteria for treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria, and these patients received rapid infusion of esketamine between June 2012 and December 2015. The Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was administered to measure and score depressive symptom severity before infusion and at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after infusion. In addition, Clinical Global Impression scale was administered before and 7 days after esketamine infusion. Results: Esketamine was administered to 30 patients. A total of 27 patients met the inclusion criteria and had MADRS evaluation data, which showed that 23 had unipolar and 4 had bipolar depression. Thirteen patients (48.1%) showed therapeutic response (MADRS reduction. 50%) within 1 week (7 days) of intervention. Remission (MADRS. 7) was observed in 10 patients (37.0%) in the same period. Therapeutic response and remission frequencies were seen in 16 (59.3%) and 11 (40.7%) patients, respectively, within 24 hours following drug infusion. The most relevant side effect observed during the esketamine infusion was dissociative symptoms ranging from mild to severe, which was reported by 11.1% of patients as a very disturbing experience. Limitations: This study was done retrospectively, had a small sample size, and there was no comparative group. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that rapid infusion of esketamine is possibly not the optimal choice to administer this drug for treatment-resistant depression due to tolerability reasons. Further controlled studies are required to investigate efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles among the different types of ketamines and methods of using this drug in depressed patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1627 / 1632
页数:6
相关论文