Bootstrap quantification of estimation uncertainties in network degree distributions

被引:18
|
作者
Gel, Yulia R. [1 ]
Lyubchich, Vyacheslav [2 ]
Ramirez Ramirez, L. Leticia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Math Sci, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Solomons, MD 20688 USA
[3] Ctr Invest Matemat, Guanajuato 36023, Mexico
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2017年 / 7卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
RANDOM GRAPHS; INFERENCE; EVOLUTION; PATTERNS; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-05885-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We propose a new method of nonparametric bootstrap to quantify estimation uncertainties in functions of network degree distribution in large ultra sparse networks. Both network degree distribution and network order are assumed to be unknown. The key idea is based on adaptation of the "blocking" argument, developed for bootstrapping of time series and re-tiling of spatial data, to random networks. We first sample a set of multiple ego networks of varying orders that form a patch, or a network block analogue, and then resample the data within patches. To select an optimal patch size, we develop a new computationally efficient and data-driven cross-validation algorithm. The proposed fast patchwork bootstrap (FPB) methodology further extends the ideas for a case of network mean degree, to inference on a degree distribution. In addition, the FPB is substantially less computationally expensive, requires less information on a graph, and is free from nuisance parameters. In our simulation study, we show that the new bootstrap method outperforms competing approaches by providing sharper and better-calibrated confidence intervals for functions of a network degree distribution than other available approaches, including the cases of networks in an ultra sparse regime. We illustrate the FPB in application to collaboration networks in statistics and computer science and to Wikipedia networks.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bootstrap quantification of estimation uncertainties in network degree distributions
    Yulia R. Gel
    Vyacheslav Lyubchich
    L. Leticia Ramirez Ramirez
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [2] BOOTSTRAP ESTIMATION OF CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTIONS
    BOOTH, J
    HALL, P
    WOOD, A
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1992, 20 (03): : 1594 - 1610
  • [3] Comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimation of uncertainties of DTI parameters
    Chung, SungWon
    Lu, Ying
    Henry, Roland G.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 33 (02) : 531 - 541
  • [4] Estimation of hygrometry uncertainties by propagation of distributions
    Carpentier, V
    Megharfi, M
    Quint, J
    Priel, M
    Desenfant, M
    Morice, R
    METROLOGIA, 2004, 41 (06) : 432 - 438
  • [5] Quantification and Comparison of Degree Distributions in Complex Networks
    Aliakbary, Sadegh
    Habibi, Jafar
    Movaghar, Ali
    2014 7TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS (IST), 2014, : 464 - 469
  • [6] ESTIMATION OF ERROR RATES BY MEANS OF SIMULATED BOOTSTRAP DISTRIBUTIONS
    WERNECKE, KD
    KALB, G
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 29 (03) : 287 - 292
  • [7] GRAPH SAMPLING: ESTIMATION OF DEGREE DISTRIBUTIONS
    Deri, Joya A.
    Moura, Jose M. F.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2013, : 6501 - 6505
  • [8] A bootstrap procedure for local semiparametric density estimation amid model uncertainties
    Soleymani, Mehdi
    Lee, Stephen M. S.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2014, 153 : 75 - 86
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTIES IN THE ESTIMATION OF FATIGUE DAMAGE IN MARITIME STRUCTURES BY THE BOOTSTRAP TECHNIQUE
    Vasconcelos, Antonio
    Prates de Lima, Edison Castro
    Sudati Sagrilo, Luis Volnei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING 2010, VOL 2, 2010, : 339 - 344
  • [10] Estimation in inverse Gaussian regression: comparison of asymptotic and bootstrap distributions
    Chaubey, YP
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2002, 100 (02) : 135 - 143