共 50 条
Human papillomavirus-based screening at extended intervals missed fewer cervical precancers than cytology in the HPV For Cervical Cancer (HPV FOCAL) trial
被引:10
|作者:
Gottschlich, Anna
[1
,2
]
Gondara, Lovedeep
[3
]
Smith, Laurie W.
[1
,4
]
Cook, Darrel
[5
]
Martin, Ruth Elwood
[2
]
Lee, Marette
[2
,6
]
Peacock, Stuart
[4
,7
]
Proctor, Lily
[1
,2
,6
]
Stuart, Gavin
[2
]
Krajden, Mel
[2
,5
]
Franco, Eduardo L.
[8
]
van Niekerk, Dirk
[2
,6
]
Ogilvie, Gina
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Womens Hlth Res Inst, BC Womens Hosp & Hlth Serv, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] BC Canc Agcy, Dept Data & Analyt, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] BC Canc Agcy, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] BC Ctr Dis Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] BC Canc Agcy, Cervix Screening Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[7] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] McGill Univ, Div Canc Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
cervical cancer;
extended screening intervals;
HPV-based screening;
INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA;
FOLLOW-UP;
RISK;
REGRESSION;
TESTS;
WOMEN;
D O I:
10.1002/ijc.34039
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
While cervix screening using cytology is recommended at 2- to 3-year intervals, given the increased sensitivity of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening to detect precancer, HPV-based screening is recommended every 4- to 5-years. As organized cervix screening programs transition from cytology to HPV-based screening with extended intervals, there is some concern that cancers will be missed between screens. Participants in HPV FOr CervicAL Cancer (HPV FOCAL) trial received cytology (Cytology Arm) at 24-month intervals or HPV-based screening (HPV Arm) at 48-month intervals; both arms received co-testing (cytology and HPV testing) at exit. We investigated the results of the co-test to identify participants with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) who would not have had their precancer detected if they had only their arm's respective primary screen. In the Cytology Arm, 25/62 (40.3%) identified CIN2+s were missed by primary screen (ie, normal cytology/positive HPV test) and all 25 had normal cytology at the prior 24-month screen. In the HPV arm, three CIN2+s (3/49, 6.1%) were missed by primary screen (ie, negative HPV test/abnormal cytology). One of these three misses had low-grade cytology findings and would also not have been referred to colposcopy outside of the trial. Multiple rounds of cytology did not detect some precancerous lesions detected with one round of HPV-based screening. In our population, cytology missed more CIN2+, even at shorter screening intervals, than HPV-based screening. This assuages concerns about missed detection postimplementation of an extended interval HPV-based screening program. We recommend that policymakers consider a shift from cytology to HPV-based cervix screening.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 905
页数:9
相关论文