Assessment of commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays, Jamaica

被引:5
|
作者
Butterfield, Tiffany R. [1 ]
Bruce-Mowatt, Alrica [1 ]
Phillips, Yakima Z. R. [1 ]
Brown, Nicole [1 ]
Francis, Keisha [1 ]
Brown, Jabari [2 ]
Walker, Jerome P. [1 ]
McKnight, Niel A. L. [1 ]
Ehikhametalor, Kelvin [3 ]
Taylor, Devon K. [4 ]
Bruce, Carl A. [5 ]
McGrowder, Donovan [2 ]
Wharfe, Gilian [2 ]
Sandiford, Simone L. [6 ]
Thompson, Tamara K. [7 ]
Anzinger, Joshua J. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Indies, Dept Microbiol, Kingston, Jamaica
[2] Univ West Indies, Dept Pathol, Kingston, Jamaica
[3] Univ West Indies, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Kingston, Jamaica
[4] AstraZeneca, Dept Oncol Res, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[5] Univ West Indies, Dept Surg, Kingston, Jamaica
[6] Univ West Indies, Dept Basic Med Sci, Kingston, Jamaica
[7] Univ West Indies, Dept Med, Kingston, Jamaica
[8] Global Virus Network, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Antibody; Serology; Caribbean; Jamaica;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.059
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: The performance of the Roche Elecsys (R) Anti-SARS-CoV-2, Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgM, Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgA, Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, and Trillium IgG/IgM rapid assays was evaluated in Jamaica. Methods: Diagnostic sensitivities of the assays were assessed by testing serum samples from SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed persons and diagnostic specificity was assessed by testing serum samples collected during 2018-2019 from healthy persons and from persons with antibodies to a wide range of viral infections. Results: Serum samples collected >14 days after onset of symptoms, or an initial SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive test for asymptomatics, showed diagnostic sensitivities ranging from 67.9 to 75.0% when including all possible disease severities and increased to 90.0-95.0% when examining those with moderate to critical disease. Grouping moderate to critical disease showed a significant association with a SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive result for all assays. Diagnostic specificity ranged from 96.7 to 100.0%. For all assays examined, SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values of the initial nasopharyngeal swab sample testing positive were significantly different for samples testing antibody positive versus negative. Conclusions: These data from a predominantly African descent Caribbean population show comparable diagnostic sensitivities and specificities for all testing platforms assessed and limited utility of these tests for persons with asymptomatic and mild infections. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 336
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of commercial assays for the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in hemodialysis patients
    Di Meo, Ashley
    Ma, Liyan
    Yau, Kevin
    Abe, Kento T.
    Colwill, Karen
    Gingras, Anne-Claude
    Kozak, Robert
    Hladunewich, Michelle A.
    Yip, Paul M.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 121
  • [2] The need for and challenges of comparing SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays
    Jacquot, Cyril
    Feys, Hendrik B.
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, 2021, 31 (03) : 147 - 148
  • [3] What to Expect from Antibody Assays of SARS-CoV-2?
    Yi, Xin
    Cao, Jing
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 5 (05): : 1126 - 1130
  • [4] Comprehensive evaluation of eight commercial SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays
    Honemann, Mario
    Lueck, Christian
    Maier, Melanie
    Pietsch, Corinna
    Dietze, Nadine
    Berthold, Tom
    Encalada, Marco Vinicio Narvaez
    Gruenewald, Thomas
    Neumeister, Volker
    Dalpke, Alexander
    Liebert, Uwe Gerd
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 100 (04)
  • [5] Serological Assays for Assessing Postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response
    Mahmoud, Sally A.
    Ganesan, Subhashini
    Naik, Shivaraj
    Bissar, Safaa
    Al Zamel, Isra
    Warren, K. N.
    Zaher, Walid A.
    Khan, Gulfaraz
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (02):
  • [6] Validation and performance comparison of three SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays
    Paiva, Kimberly J.
    Grisson, Ricky D.
    Chan, Philip A.
    Huard, Richard C.
    Caliendo, Angela M.
    Lonks, John R.
    King, Ewa
    Tang, Eric W.
    Pytel-Parenteau, Diane L.
    Nam, Ga H.
    Yakirevich, Evgeny
    Lu, Shaolei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (02) : 916 - 923
  • [7] Commercial Serology Assays Predict Neutralization Activity against SARS-CoV-2
    Suhandynata, Raymond T.
    Hoffman, Melissa A.
    Huang, Deli
    Tran, Jenny T.
    Kelner, Michael J.
    Reed, Sharon L.
    McLawhon, Ronald W.
    Voss, James E.
    Nemazee, David
    Fitzgerald, Robert L.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 67 (02) : 404 - 414
  • [8] Association between SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies and Commercial Serological Assays
    Tang, Mei San
    Case, James Brett
    Franks, Caroline E.
    Chen, Rita E.
    Anderson, Neil W.
    Henderson, Jeffrey P.
    Diamond, Michael S.
    Gronowski, Ann M.
    Farnsworth, Christopher W.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 66 (12) : 1538 - 1547
  • [9] Comparison of commercial assays and laboratory developed tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Dust, Kerry
    Hedley, Adam
    Nichol, Kim
    Stein, Derek
    Adam, Heather
    Karlowsky, James A.
    Bullard, Jared
    Van Caeseele, Paul
    Alexander, David C.
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 285
  • [10] A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays evaluated in Auckland, New Zealand
    Fox-Lewis, Shivani
    Whitcombe, Alana
    McGregor, Reuben
    Carlton, Lauren
    Hwang, Yulia
    Austin, Paul
    Aspin, Lisa
    Raill, Bryan
    Webb, Rachel
    Taylor, Susan
    Morpeth, Susan
    Roberts, Sally
    Moreland, Nicole J.
    McAuliffe, Gary
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 133 (1525) : 127 - 131