Visual acuity after penetrating keratoplasty for pseudophakic and aphakic bullous keratopathy

被引:10
|
作者
Schraepen, P [1 ]
Koppen, C [1 ]
Tassignon, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, B-2650 Antwerp, Belgium
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01742-X
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify prognostic factors that determine the visual acuity after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for bullous keratopathy secondary to cataract surgery. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Methods: Twenty-six patients who had PKP for bullous keratopathy were examined before and after surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups: pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) after cataract extraction with implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC IOL) (Group 1) or an anterior chamber IOL (AC IOL) (Group 2); aphakic bullous keratopathy (ABK) (Group 3). The following parameters were recorded: preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, age at the time of surgery, interval between cataract surgery and development of bullous keratopathy, presence of an AC IOL or a PC IOL, aphakia, and presence of concomitant ocular pathology. Results: Visual acuity improved in Group 1 (0.02 to 0.26); no visual improvement was observed in the other groups. Posterior segment damage occurred in one third of the patients in Group 1 and in all patients in the other groups. Patients with an intact posterior segment had a significantly better visual outcome. In eyes without posterior segment pathology, visual acuity improved from a mean of 0.03 (range 0 to 0.20) to a mean of 0.37 (range 0.03 to 0.90). In eyes with posterior segment pathology, no visual acuity improvement could be obtained. Conclusion: The most important negative prognostic factors affecting visual acuity were the presence of concomitant ocular pathology, an AC IOL, and a long interval between surgery and the development of bullous keratopathy.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 486
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESULTS OF PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR APHAKIC AND PSEUDOPHAKIC BULLOUS KERATOPATHY
    SCHANZLIN, DJ
    ROBIN, JB
    GOMEZ, DS
    GINDI, JJ
    SMITH, RE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1984, 98 (03) : 302 - 312
  • [2] Refractive aspects of penetrating keratoplasty by aphakic and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy
    Slonimsky, AY
    SOE '97 - XI CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 1067 - 1071
  • [4] PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY IN PSEUDOPHAKIC BULLOUS KERATOPATHY
    MEYER, RF
    SUGAR, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1980, 90 (05) : 677 - 681
  • [5] VISUAL RESULTS AFTER PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR APHAKIC BULLOUS KERATOPATHY AND FUCHS DYSTROPHY
    OLSON, RJ
    WALTMAN, SR
    MATTINGLY, TP
    KAUFMAN, HE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1979, 88 (06) : 1000 - 1004
  • [6] Clearing of the host cornea after penetrating keratoplasty for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy
    Groh, MJM
    Seitz, B
    Küchle, M
    Naumann, GOH
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1999, 215 (05) : 275 - 280
  • [7] Penetrating keratoplasty for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy - An Indian experience
    Panda, A
    Sharma, N
    Angra, SK
    ADVANCES IN CORNEAL RESEARCH: SELECTED TRANSACTIONS OF THE WORLD CONGRESS ON THE CORNEA IV, 1997, : 195 - 201
  • [8] Ultrasound biomicroscopy study of the Verisyse aphakic intraocular lens combined with penetrating keratoplasty in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy
    Gicquel, Jean-Jacques
    Guigou, Sebastien
    Bejjani, Riad A.
    Briat, Benoit
    Ellies, Pierre
    Dighiero, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 33 (03): : 455 - 464
  • [9] Inadvertent retention of Descemet membrane after penetrating keratoplasty for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy
    Ontiveros-Holguin, Alejandro
    Pacheco-Padron, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2022, 2022 (08):
  • [10] PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR PSEUDOPHAKIC BULLOUS KERATOPATHY AFTER EXTRACAPSULAR CATARACT-EXTRACTION
    KOENIG, SB
    SCHULTZ, RO
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 105 (04) : 348 - 353