Variables affecting interpretation of skin prick test results

被引:7
|
作者
Topal, Suhan Gunasti [1 ]
Karaman, Bilge Fettahlioglu [1 ]
Aksungur, Varol L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Dermatol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
关键词
Devices; intertester agreement; skin prick test; variability; TEST DEVICES; ALLERGY;
D O I
10.4103/0378-6323.192956
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Both performer-and device-dependent variabilities have been reported in sizes of wheal responses to skin prick tests. Objective: We aimed to evaluate whether or not variabilities in sizes of wheal responses influence the final interpretation of skin prick tests; in other words, the decision on whether or not there is an allergy to a given antigen. Methods: Skin prick tests with positive and negative controls and extracts of Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus were done for 69 patients by two different persons, using two different puncturing devices-disposable 22-gauge hypodermic needles and metal lancets. Results: Among four different skin prick tests, the average coefficients of variation in sizes of wheal responses were near to or higher than 20% for all of them. On the other hand, in the final interpretation of results, kappa values indicated substantial or almost perfect agreements between these tests. However, the frequency of establishing allergy to the house dust mites widely ranged in these tests (20.8-35.8% for D. farinae and 20.8-28.3% for D. pteronyssinus). Limitations: The conduction of the study in a single center and the comparisons of results of only two performers. Conclusion: We feel that variabilities in sizes of wheal responses of skin prick test can influence its categorical results.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 204
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement and interpretation of skin prick test results
    van der Valk, J. P. M.
    van Wijk, R. Gerth
    Hoorn, E.
    Groenendijk, L.
    Groenendijk, I. M.
    de Jong, N. W.
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2016, 6
  • [2] Factors affecting the sensitivity of skin prick test
    Dogru, M.
    Duman, H.
    Ozmen, S.
    Bostanci, I
    ALLERGY, 2013, 68 : 575 - 575
  • [3] Is the menstrual cycle affecting the skin prick test reactivity?
    Kirmaz, C
    Yuksel, H
    Mete, N
    Bayrak, P
    Baytur, YB
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 22 (04): : 197 - 203
  • [4] Skin Prick Automated Test device offers more reliable allergy test results compared to a manual skin prick test
    Seys, Sven F.
    Roux, Karolien
    Claes, Caroline
    Van Cappellen, Lore
    Werpin, Louis
    Thompson, Mark
    Loeckx, Dirk
    Sebrechts, Hendrik
    Gorris, Senne
    Van Gerven, Laura
    RHINOLOGY, 2024, 62 (02) : 216 - 222
  • [5] Skin disease and prick test results in rural Iowa
    Susitaival, P
    Merchant, JA
    Hoylman-Henning, B
    Yeoman, A
    Stromquist, A
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 110 (02) : 200 - 200
  • [6] SKIN PRICK TEST (SPT) RESULTS IN THE EVALUATION OF IMMUNOTHERAPY (IT)
    DREBORG, S
    HOLGERSSON, M
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY, 1985, 55 (02): : 258 - 258
  • [7] LONGITUDINAL VARIABILITY OF SKIN PRICK TEST-RESULTS
    KUEHR, J
    KARMAUS, W
    FRISCHER, T
    HENDELKRAMER, A
    WEISS, K
    MOSELER, M
    STEPHAN, V
    FORSTER, J
    URBANEK, R
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1992, 22 (09): : 839 - 844
  • [8] Food skin prick test results in the patients with urticaria
    Ozseker, F.
    Bulut, I
    ALLERGY, 2015, 70 : 602 - 602
  • [9] Comparison of a new Skin Prick Test Tape with the conventional skin prick test
    Gong, Zhengpeng
    Yang, Zhijie
    Wu, Ran
    Ye, Huiping
    Jia, Min
    Zhang, Nan
    Bachert, Claus
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 143 (01) : 424 - 427
  • [10] Skin prick test results in snoring and sleep apnea patients
    Riemann, R
    Riemann, E
    Milewski, C
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2002, 81 (03): : 226 - 232