Dynamic approximation method for removal function size in magnetorheological finishing

被引:5
|
作者
Yang, Hang [1 ]
Zhang, Qiang [1 ]
Zhu, Zhenglong [1 ]
Fan, Wei [2 ]
Zhang, Yunfei [2 ]
Huang, Wen [2 ]
机构
[1] Zunyi Normal Univ, Dept Engn, Zunyi, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Engn Phys, Inst Mech Machining Technol, Mianyang, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
magnetorheological finishing; removal function; dynamic approximation; generation mechanism; CALIBRATION; MRF;
D O I
10.1117/1.OE.58.9.095103
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
In magnetorheological finishing (MRF), predicting the size of a removal function plays an important role in determining the efficiency of optical material removal. The size of the removal function can be adjusted for different immersion depths of optical parts into the MRF ribbon, which enables the development of multiple MRF-processing algorithms: dwell-time calculation, path planning, or dynamic control of MRF instruments. However, few methods for such algorithms have been developed to dynamically approximate the size of removal functions with respect to various immersion depths. Thus, the ability to dynamically approximate the size of the MRF removal function is indeed of significance. A dynamic approximation method is designed after analyzing the generation mechanism of removal function and its size; establishing the equations for size, which are further numerically analyzed and simplified for common MRF configurations; and approximating the length and width of removal function dynamically. The approximation accuracy is verified through experimental tests where UBK7 optical parts are polished on a PKC1000-Q2 MRF installation. It is revealed that the approximation errors for the length and width are less than 6% and 8%, respectively. (C) 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calibration and prediction of removal function in magnetorheological finishing
    Dai, Yifan
    Song, Ci
    Peng, Xiaoqiang
    Shi, Feng
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2010, 49 (03) : 298 - 306
  • [2] Material removal in magnetorheological finishing of optics
    Kordonski, William
    Gorodkin, Sergei
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2011, 50 (14) : 1984 - 1994
  • [3] Distortion law analysis and deduction of removal function for magnetorheological finishing of conical mirror
    Yang, Jun
    Fan, Wei
    Hai, Kuo
    Zhang, Yunfei
    Huang, Wen
    [J]. Guangxue Jingmi Gongcheng/Optics and Precision Engineering, 2023, 31 (16): : 2383 - 2394
  • [4] Research on process optimization of magnetorheological finishing basing on predictive model of removal function
    College of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, National Univ. of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
    [J]. Guofang Keji Daxue Xuebao, 2009, 4 (20-24):
  • [5] Research on material removal mechanism of magnetorheological finishing
    Kang, Guiwen
    Zhang, Feihu
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MATERIALS MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY II, 2006, 532-533 : 133 - +
  • [6] Removal rate model for magnetorheological finishing of glass
    DeGroote, Jessica E.
    Marino, Anne E.
    Wilson, John P.
    Bishop, Amy L.
    Lambropoulos, John C.
    Jacobs, Stephen D.
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2007, 46 (32) : 7927 - 7941
  • [7] New magnetically assisted finishing method: material removal with magnetorheological fluid jet
    Kordonski, W
    Shorey, A
    Sekeres, A
    [J]. OPTICAL MANUFACUTRING AND TESTING V, 2003, 5180 : 107 - 114
  • [8] Removal of subsurface damage in grinding by magnetorheological finishing
    Shi, Feng
    Dai, Yi-Fan
    Peng, Xiao-Qiang
    Wang, Zhuo
    [J]. Guangxue Jingmi Gongcheng/Optics and Precision Engineering, 2010, 18 (01): : 162 - 168
  • [9] High-accuracy process based on the corrective calibration of removal function in the magnetorheological finishing
    Zhong, Xianyun
    Fan, Bin
    Wu, Fan
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 56 (08)
  • [10] Clitella Magnetorheological Finishing Method and Equipment
    Yang Zhi-qiang
    Guo Zhong-da
    Liu Wei-guo
    [J]. ADVANCES IN OPTICS MANUFACTURE, 2013, 552 : 227 - 233