Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients Before and After Utilizing Estimated Posttransplant Survival Score for Kidneys Allocation in Malaysia

Background. The Malaysian Kidney Allocation System implemented in 2020 includes only kidney transplant candidates with estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) score of < 20%, in replacement of Malaysian Organs Sharing System, which was based solely on dialysis vintage. We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTRs) with EPTS < 20% to those with EPTS > 20%.Methods. All DDKTRs between January 1, 2015, and December 29, 2020, were included and categorized into 2 groups: EPTS < 20% and EPTS > 20%. Cox regression was performed to evaluate the association of EPTS score and patient survival. The rate of postoperative complications, graft failure and patient survival were compared between 2 groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS v26 and R v4.0.4. The study complies with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration.Results. We included 159 DDKTRs, with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 10-60 months). The mean age of those with EPTS < 20% was 32.2 & PLUSMN; 3.4 years and those with EPTS > 20% was 46.0 & PLUSMN; 6.7 years, and the median EPTS score were 16% (range, 12%-18%) and 38% (range, 27%-56.5%), respectively. EPTS score was associated with patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.031; 95% CI 1.010-1.052; P = .003), and the cutoff points of 30% and above were associated with worse survival. It showed good discrimination (C-index, 0.729; 95% CI 0.579-0.878; P = .003) and the optimal cutoff value was 38% (65.5% sensitivity, 68.8% specificity, 17.8% positive predictive value, and 95.8% negative predictive value). Both groups had similar rate of surgical complications (P = .191), graft failure (P = .503), and patient survival (P = .654), but those with EPTS > 20% had higher incidence of urinary tract infection (9.3% vs 27.6%, P = .016).Conclusions. There was no difference in clinical outcomes using an EPTS cutoff point of 20% but worse patient survival if higher cutoff point was used.