DROSHA is recruited to DNA damage sites by the MRN complex to promote non-homologous end joining

被引:10
|
作者
Cabrini, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Roncador, Marco [1 ,3 ]
Galbiati, Alessandro [2 ,4 ]
Cipolla, Lina [1 ]
Maffia, Antonio [1 ,5 ]
Iannelli, Fabio [2 ]
Sabbioneda, Simone [1 ]
di Fagagna, Fabrizio d'Adda [1 ,2 ]
Francia, Sofia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CNR Consiglio Nazl Ric, Ist Genet Mol, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] IFOM Fdn FIRC Inst Mol Oncol Fdn, I-20139 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Spital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] AstraZeneca, DDR Biol Biosci Oncol R&D, Cambridge CB2 0AA, England
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mol & Cell Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
芬兰科学院; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
DNA damage; DROSHA; Non-homologous end joining; NHEJ; STRAND-BREAK REPAIR; ATM; PATHWAY; CANCER; RNAS; VISUALIZATION; BIOGENESIS; MECHANISMS; MUTATIONS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1242/jcs.249706
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The DNA damage response (DDR) is the signaling cascade that recognizes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and promotes their resolution via the DNA repair pathways of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). We and others have shown that DDR activation requires DROSHA; however, whether DROSHA exerts its functions by associating with damage sites, what controls its recruitment, and how DROSHA influences DNA repair remains poorly understood. Here, we show that DROSHA associates with DSBs independently of transcription. Neither H2AX, nor ATM or DNA-PK kinase activities are required for recruitment of DROSHA to break sites. Rather, DROSHA interacts with RAD50, and inhibition of the MRN complex by mirin treatment abolishes this interaction. MRN complex inactivation by RAD50 knockdown or mirin treatment prevents DROSHA recruitment to DSBs and, as a consequence, also prevents 53BP1 (also known as TP53BP1) recruitment. During DNA repair, DROSHA inactivation reduces NHEJ and boosts HR frequency. Indeed, DROSHA knockdown also increases the association of downstream HR factors such as RAD51 to DNA ends. Overall, our results demonstrate that DROSHA is recruited at DSBs by the MRN complex and directs DNA repair towards NHEJ.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-homologous DNA end joining
    Pastwa, E
    Blasiak, J
    ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA, 2003, 50 (04) : 891 - 908
  • [2] ZNF281 is recruited on DNA breaks to facilitate DNA repair by non-homologous end joining
    Sara Nicolai
    Robert Mahen
    Giuseppe Raschellà
    Alberto Marini
    Marco Pieraccioli
    Michal Malewicz
    Ashok R. Venkitaraman
    Gerry Melino
    Oncogene, 2020, 39 : 754 - 766
  • [3] ZNF281 is recruited on DNA breaks to facilitate DNA repair by non-homologous end joining
    Nicolai, Sara
    Mahen, Robert
    Raschella, Giuseppe
    Marini, Alberto
    Pieraccioli, Marco
    Malewicz, Michal
    Venkitaraman, Ashok R.
    Melino, Gerry
    ONCOGENE, 2020, 39 (04) : 754 - 766
  • [4] Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining
    Shuman, Stewart
    Glickman, Michael S.
    NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 5 (11) : 852 - 861
  • [5] Non-homologous DNA end joining in anticancer therapy
    Pastwa, Elzbieta
    Malinowski, Mariusz
    CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2007, 7 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [6] Non-homologous end joining as a mechanism of DNA repair
    Barnes, DE
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (12) : R455 - R457
  • [7] Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining
    Stewart Shuman
    Michael S. Glickman
    Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2007, 5 : 852 - 861
  • [8] Antagonistic relationship of NuA4 with the non-homologous end-joining machinery at DNA damage sites
    Ahmad, Salar
    Cote, Valerie
    Chengid, Xue
    Bourriquen, Gaelle
    Sapountzi, Vasileia
    Altafid, Mohammed
    Cote, Jacques
    PLOS GENETICS, 2021, 17 (09):
  • [9] A curious new role for MRN in Schizosaccharomyces pombe non-homologous end-joining
    Runge, Kurt W.
    Li, Yanhui
    CURRENT GENETICS, 2018, 64 (02) : 359 - 364
  • [10] A curious new role for MRN in Schizosaccharomyces pombe non-homologous end-joining
    Kurt W. Runge
    Yanhui Li
    Current Genetics, 2018, 64 : 359 - 364