The spirituality index of well-being: A new instrument for health-related quality-of-life research

被引:135
|
作者
Daaleman, TP [1 ]
Frey, BB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Family Med, Program Aging Disabil & Long Term Care, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
spirituality; subjective well-being; measurement; questionnaires; data collection; quality of life;
D O I
10.1370/afm.89
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Despite considerable interest in examining spirituality in health-related quality-of-life studies, there is a paucity of instruments that measure this construct. The objective of this study was to test a valid and reliable measure of spirituality that would be useful in patient populations. METHODS We conducted a multisite, cross-sectional survey using systematic sampling of adult outpatients at primary care clinic sites in the Kansas City metropolitan area (N = 523). We determined the instrument reliability (Cronbach's alpha, test-retest) and validity (confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validation) of the Spirituality Index of Well-Being (SIWB). RESULTS The SIWB contains 12 items: 6 from a self-efficacy domain and 6 from a life scheme domain. Confirmatory factor analysis found the following fit indices: x(2) (54, n = 508) = 508.35, P < .001; Comparative Fit Index = .98; Tucker-Lewis Index = .97; root mean square error of approximation = .13. The index had the following reliability results: for the self-efficacy subscale, alpha = .86 and test-retest r = 0.77; for the life scheme subscale, alpha = .89 and test-retest r = 0.86; and for the total scale alpha = .91 and test-retest r = 0.79, showing very good reliability. The SIWB had significant and expected correlations with other quality-of-life instruments that measure well-being or spirituality: Zung Depression Scale (r = 0-.42, P < .001), General Well-Being Scale (r = 0.64, P < .001), and Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWB) (r = 0.62, P < .001). There was a modest correlation between the religious well-being subscale of the SWB and the SIWB (r 0.35, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The Spirituality Index of Well-Being is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in health-related quality-of-life studies.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 503
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health-related quality of life and well-being
    Mukuria, Clara
    Brazier, John E.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 62 - 62
  • [2] Zopiclone, health-related quality of life, and daytime well-being
    Idzikowski, C
    [J]. REVIEWS IN CONTEMPORARY PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1998, 9 (02): : 141 - 146
  • [3] Measuring a dimension of spirituality for health research - Validity of the spirituality index of well-being
    Frey, BB
    Daaleman, TP
    Peyton, V
    [J]. RESEARCH ON AGING, 2005, 27 (05) : 556 - 577
  • [4] Strengths Use as a Predictor of Well-Being and Health-Related Quality of Life
    Carmel Proctor
    John Maltby
    P. Alex Linley
    [J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2011, 12 : 153 - 169
  • [5] Strengths Use as a Predictor of Well-Being and Health-Related Quality of Life
    Proctor, Carmel
    Maltby, John
    Linley, P. Alex
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2011, 12 (01) : 153 - 169
  • [6] HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN HEADACHE RESEARCH
    LIPTON, RB
    STEWART, WF
    [J]. HEADACHE, 1995, 35 (08): : 447 - 448
  • [7] Relations between health-related quality of life and well-being:: The gerontologist's new clothes?
    Spiro, A
    Bossé, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 50 (04): : 297 - 318
  • [8] My Passion for Quality-of-Life and Well-Being Research: an Autobiography
    Sirgy, M. Joseph
    [J]. APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2015, 10 (02) : 371 - 373
  • [9] The Relationship Between Spirituality, Health-Related Behavior, and Psychological Well-Being
    Bozek, Agnieszka
    Nowak, Pawel F.
    Blukacz, Mateusz
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [10] Promoting quality-of-life and well-being research in hospitality and tourism
    Sirgy, M. Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2019, 36 (01) : 1 - 13