Risk minimization practices for pregnancy prevention: understanding risk, selecting tools

被引:4
|
作者
Uhl, Kathleen
Trontell, Anne
Kennedy, Dianne
机构
[1] US FDA, Off Womens Hlth, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[2] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20857 USA
[3] Ctr Outcomes & Evidence, Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
pregnancy; drugs/medications; teratogens; birth defects; risk management; risk minimization; prevention; pregnancy prevention;
D O I
10.1002/pds.1312
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
According to the March of Dimes, approximately 4% (1/28) of babies are born in the US each year with a birth defect. For the majority of birth defects the etiology is unknown, although chemicals, including drug exposures, probably account for less than 1% of all birth defects. The identification of potential human teratogenicity during drug development is important because drug-induced adverse fetal effects are potentially preventable with the application of risk assessment strategies and risk minimization tools and programs to minimize risk of pregnancy exposure while preserving access to drug benefits; risk assessment and risk minimization together comprise risk management. It is important that risk minimization programs intended to limit fetal exposure use a consistent approach and are tailored to the product-specific risk concerns in order to optimize the benefit-fisk balance for a particular drug. This paper highlights general considerations in developing specific risk minimization programs to prevent fetal drug exposure including the relative advantages and disadvantages of each strategy. Published in 2006 by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 348
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiation therapy in pregnancy: Risk calculation and risk minimization
    Greskovich, JF
    Macklis, RM
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2000, 27 (06) : 633 - 645
  • [2] A model for selecting risk assessment tools at industrial plants
    Ray, PS
    Srinivasan, R
    [J]. QUALITY OF WORK AND PRODUCTS IN ENTERPRISES OF THE FUTURE, 2003, : 193 - 195
  • [3] Digital Tools for the Communication of Risk Minimization Measures for Medicines
    Forstner, M.
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 42 (10) : 1220 - 1221
  • [4] Digital tools for the communication of risk minimization measures for medicines
    Forstner, Michael
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 4 - 5
  • [5] Preconception Markers of Dual Risk for Alcohol and Smoking Exposed Pregnancy: Tools for Primary Prevention
    Ingersoll, Karen S.
    Hettema, Jennifer E.
    Cropsey, Karen L.
    Jackson, Justin P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 20 (11) : 1627 - 1633
  • [6] Could Virtual Model of Antenatal Class Improve the Practices of High Risk Prevention in Pregnancy?
    Sriatmi, Ayun
    Suwitri, Sri
    Shahuliyah, Zahroh
    Nugraheni, Sri Achadi
    [J]. MEDIA PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN KESEHATAN, 2020, 30 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [7] Understanding Risk for Better Stroke Prevention
    Saposnik, Gustavo
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (05) : E1
  • [8] VTE Risk Assessment and Prevention in Pregnancy
    O'Rourke, Ellen
    Faryal, Rehman
    Blondon, Marc
    Middeldorp, Saskia
    Ainle, Fionnuala Ni
    [J]. HAMOSTASEOLOGIE, 2024, 44 (03): : 218 - 225
  • [9] General prevention and risk minimization in LCA - A combined approach
    Sleeswijk, AW
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2003, 10 (01) : 69 - 77
  • [10] General prevention and risk minimization in LCA A combined approach
    Anneke Wegener Sleeswijk
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2003, 10 : 69 - 77