共 2 条
Cumulative live birth rates in egg donor IVF cycles with or without endometrial scratching: Is there a residual effect in subsequent embryo transfers? Follow-up results of a RCT in clinical practice
被引:1
|作者:
Izquierdo, Alexandra
[1
,6
]
de la Fuente, Laura
[2
]
Spies, Katharina
[1
]
Lora, David
[3
,4
]
Galindo, Alberto
[5
]
机构:
[1] Procreatec, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Hosp 12 Octubre, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Human Reprod Unit, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Hosp 12 Octubre, Clin Res Unit imas12 CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Complutense Madrid UCM, Fac Estudios Estadist, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Complutense Madrid, 12 Octubre Res Inst imas12, Univ Hosp 12 Octubre, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Fetal Med Unit Maternal & C, Madrid, Spain
[6] Medipole Lyon Villeurbanne, 158 Rue Leon Blum, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France
关键词:
Endometrial scratching;
Implantation failure;
In vitro fertilization;
Egg donor cycle;
Endometrial receptivity;
IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION;
LOCAL INJURY;
PREGNANCY RATES;
TRIAL;
WOMEN;
HYSTEROSCOPY;
IMPLANTATION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102335
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Endometrial scratching (ES) is a simple technique that has been claimed to improve pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques. Our objective was to acknowledge the effects of ES in subsequent embryo transfers by assessing the cumulative live birth rates (LBR) in patients undergo-ing egg-donor in vitro fertilization (IVF). Material and Methods: We performed a follow-up analysis of the cumulative reproductive outcomes of the 352 patients included in the Endoscratch Trial (NCT03108157) during the twelve months following the ran-domization date. We compared the outcomes of patients who underwent an ES for the second and/or succes-sive embryo transfers versus those who did not have an ES performed, in order to determine a possible carry over effect that could lead to different LBR in these groups. Results: Our analysis reveals that both groups (with and without ES performed before the first embryo trans-fer) had similar cumulative LBR (69.9% vs 65.9% in group A and B respectively, RR: 1.20, 95% confidence inter-val (CI): 0.92-1.22, p = 0.42). When we analyzed the results comparing patients who had received at least an ES before any of the embryo transfers during that period, we did not find any differences in LBR either (68.0% in patients with at least an ES and 67.8% in patients without ES, RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.87-1.16, p = 0.96). Conclusion: According to our results, we cannot state that ES has a long term effect on endometrial receptivity of egg recipients as cumulative LBR do not differ from those of patients who do not receive it. (c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文