A deafening silence: a lack of data and reproducibility in published bioacoustics research?

被引：12
|
作者：
Baker, Ed [1 ,2 ]
Vincent, Sarah [1 ]
机构：
[1] Nat Hist Museum, London, England
[2] Univ York, York, N Yorkshire, England
来源：
BIODIVERSITY DATA JOURNAL | 2019年 / 7卷
关键词：
bioacoustics; open data; reproducibility; sound libraries; acoustic vouchers;
D O I：
10.3897/BDJ.7.e36783
中图分类号：
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号：
090705 ;
摘要：
A study of 100 papers from five journals that make use of bioacoustic recordings shows that only a minority (21%) deposit any of the recordings in a repository, supplementary materials section or a personal website. This lack of deposition hinders re-use of the raw data by other researchers, prevents the reproduction of a project's analyses and confirmation of its findings and impedes progress within the broader bioacoustics community. We make some recommendations for researchers interested in depositing their data.
引用
收藏
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deafening Silence: The Lack of Structured Patient Symptoms in Clinical Documentation of Angina
    Bradley, Steven M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 8 (15):
  • [2] Reproducibility of Published Research
    Klumpers, Johannes
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2018, 26 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [3] Improving the replicability and reproducibility of research published in the Journal of Research in Personality
    Lucas, Richard E.
    Donnellan, M. Brent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2013, 47 (04) : 453 - 454
  • [4] Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research
    Avidan, Michael S.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Mashour, George A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 122 (04) : 413 - 420
  • [5] Descriptive Statistics From Published Research: A Readily Available Alternative to Raw Data to Assess Analytic Reproducibility and Robustness
    Nimon, Kim
    Conley, David
    Bontrager, Marvin
    Keiffer, Greggory L.
    Hammack-Brown, Bryn
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DEVELOPING HUMAN RESOURCES, 2019, 21 (04) : 421 - 437
  • [6] THE LACK OF REPRODUCIBILITY IN RESEARCH HOW STATISTICS CAN ENDORSE RESULTS
    Goddard, Scott D.
    Johnson, Valen E.
    [J]. METODE-POPULAR SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2015, (05): : 175 - 179
  • [7] New Initiatives to Improve the Rigor and Reproducibility of Articles Published in Circulation Research
    Bolli, Roberto
    [J]. CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2017, 121 (05) : 472 - 479
  • [8] Estimating the reproducibility of social learning research published between 1955 and 2018
    Minocher, Riana
    Atmaca, Silke
    Bavero, Claudia
    McElreath, Richard
    Beheim, Bret
    [J]. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (09):
  • [9] Breaking the silence of sharing data in medical research
    Chen, Henian
    Zhao, Yayi
    Cao, Biwei
    Petersen, Donna J.
    Valente, Matthew J.
    Cen, Weiliang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [10] Lack of research reproducibility, the rise of open science and the need for continuing education in research methods
    Haring, R.
    Bell, R. J.
    [J]. CLIMACTERIC, 2018, 21 (05) : 413 - 414
12345