A survey comparing centralized and decentralized electricity markets

被引：34

作者：

Ahlqvist, Victor ^{[1
]}

Holmberg, Par ^{[2
,3
,4
]}

Tangeras, Thomas ^{[2
,3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Copenhagen Econ, Stockholm, Sweden

[2] Res Inst Ind Econ IFN, Stockholm, Sweden

[3] Univ Cambridge, Energy Policy Res Grp EPRG, Cambridge, England

[4] Stanford Univ, Program Energy & Sustainable Dev PESD, Stanford, CA USA

来源：

ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS | 2022年 / 40卷

基金：

英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;

关键词：

Wholesale electricity markets; Market clearing; Centralization; Decentralization; Unit-commitment; Self-dispatch; SUPPLY FUNCTION EQUILIBRIUM; MULTIUNIT AUCTIONS; NON-CONVEXITIES; POWER; COMPETITION; EXTERNALITIES; INCENTIVES; COMMITMENT; TRANSITION; DELEGATION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.esr.2022.100812

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

This paper surveys the literature relevant for comparing centralized and decentralized wholesale electricity markets. Under a centralized design, producers submit detailed cost data to the system operator the day before delivery, who then decides how much to produce for each generation unit. This differs from the decentralized design, which relies on self-commitment, and where producers send less detailed cost information to the system operator. US markets have converged on the centralized design, whereas the trend goes in the other direction in Europe. The paper discusses advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches and proposes suggestions for improvement of each design.

引用

页数：14

共 50 条

[1] Centralized and Decentralized Electricity Markets: Assessment of Operational and Economic Aspects
Matenli, Anneta
Abbaspourtorbati, Farzaneh
Cherkaoui, Rachid
Mende, Florian
Luongo, Luigi
[J]. 2016 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2016,
[2] Centralized and Decentralized Balance Group Optimization in Electricity Markets with Demand Response
Vrettos, Evangelos
Oldewurtel, Frauke
Vasirani, Matteo
Andersson, Goran
[J]. 2013 IEEE GRENOBLE POWERTECH (POWERTECH), 2013,
[3] Comparing centralized and decentralized institutions: A reply
Bendor, J
Mookherjee, D
[J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (03) : 695 - 697
[4] Centralized volatility reduction for electricity markets
Alshehri, Khaled
Bose, Subhonmesh
Basar, Tamer
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 133
[5] COMPARATIVE COSTS OF ELECTRICITY CONSERVATION - CENTRALIZED AND DECENTRALIZED ELECTRICITY-GENERATION
REDDY, AKN
SUMITHRA, GD
BALACHANDRA, P
DSA, A
[J]. ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY, 1990, 25 (22) : 1201 - 1216
[6] Searching for noncooperative equilibria in centralized electricity markets
Correia, PF
Overbye, TJ
Hiskens, IA
[J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (04) : 1417 - 1424
[7] On the efficiency of local electricity markets under decentralized and centralized designs: a multi-leader Stackelberg game analysis
Le Cadre, Helene
[J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 27 (04) : 953 - 984
[8] On the efficiency of local electricity markets under decentralized and centralized designs: a multi-leader Stackelberg game analysis
Hélène Le Cadre
[J]. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2019, 27 : 953 - 984
[9] Asynchronous decentralized method for interconnected electricity markets
Huang, Anni
Joo, Sung-Kwan
Song, Kyung-Bin
Kim, Jin-Ho
Lee, Kisung
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2008, 30 (04) : 283 - 290
[10] An approach for applying blockchain technology in centralized electricity markets
Aybar-Mejíaa M.
Rosario-Weeks D.
Mariano-Hernández D.
Domínguez-Garabitos M.
[J]. Electricity Journal, 2021, 34 (03):

← 1 2 3 4 5 →