Consequentiality and demand revelation in double referenda

被引:0
|
作者
Carson, Katherine S. [1 ]
Chilton, Susan M. [1 ]
Hutchinson, W. George [1 ]
机构
[1] USAF Acad, Colorado Springs, CO 80840 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 423
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Necessary conditions for demand revelation in double referenda
    Carson, Katherine Silz
    Chilton, Susan M.
    Hutchinson, W. George
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 57 (02) : 219 - 225
  • [2] Revelation on demand
    Nicolas Anciaux
    Mehdi Benzine
    Luc Bouganim
    Philippe Pucheral
    Dennis Shasha
    Distributed and Parallel Databases, 2009, 25 : 5 - 28
  • [3] Revelation on demand
    Anciaux, Nicolas
    Benzine, Mehdi
    Bouganim, Luc
    Pucheral, Philippe
    Shasha, Dennis
    DISTRIBUTED AND PARALLEL DATABASES, 2009, 25 (1-2) : 5 - 28
  • [4] Why do people non-demand reveal in hypothetical double referenda for public goods?
    Burton, Anthony C.
    Carson, Katherine S.
    Chilton, Susan M.
    Hutchinson, W. George
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2009, 41 (27) : 3561 - 3569
  • [5] JUSTICE IN VOTING BY DEMAND REVELATION
    GOOD, IJ
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 1977, 29 (02) : 65 - 70
  • [6] Demand revelation and tatonnement auctions
    Joyce, P
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1998, 36 (02) : 163 - 175
  • [7] Polling mechanisms and the demand revelation problem
    Gary-Bobo, RJ
    Jaaidane, T
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2000, 76 (02) : 203 - 238
  • [8] THE DEMAND FOR PUBLIC-SERVICES - INFERENCES FROM MUNICIPAL BOND REFERENDA
    DEBARTOLO, G
    FORTUNE, P
    NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 1982, 35 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [9] Cost allocation, demand revelation, and core implementation
    Young, HP
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1998, 36 (03) : 213 - 228
  • [10] An experimental investigation of explanations for inconsistencies in responses to second offers in double referenda
    Burton, AC
    Carson, KS
    Chilton, SM
    Hutchinson, WG
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (03) : 472 - 489