Equal Opportunity Interference: Both L1 and L2 Influence L3 Morpho-Syntactic Processing

被引:5
|
作者
Abbas, Nawras [1 ]
Degani, Tamar [2 ]
Prior, Anat [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Learning Disabil, Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Haifa, Israel
[3] Univ Haifa, Edmond J Safra Brain Res Ctr Learning Disabil, Haifa, Israel
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
trilingualism; cross-language influence; morphosyntax; English as a foreign language; interference; CROSS-LINGUISTIC INFLUENCE; LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION; 2ND-LANGUAGE GRAMMAR; EYE-TRACKING; LEARNERS; COMPREHENSION; SENSITIVITY; VIOLATIONS; FLUENCY; GERMAN;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673535
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigated cross-language influences from the first (L1) and second (L2) languages in third (L3) language processing, to examine how order of acquisition and proficiency modulate the degree of cross-language influences, and whether these cross-language influences manifest differently in online and offline measures of L3 processing. The study focused on morpho-syntactic processing of English as an L3 among Arabic-Hebrew-English university student trilinguals (n = 44). Importantly, both L1 (Arabic) and L2 (Hebrew) of participants are typologically distant from L3 (English), which allows overcoming confounds of previous research. Performance of trilinguals was compared to that of native English monolingual controls (n = 37). To investigate the source of cross-language influences, critical stimuli were ungrammatical sentences in English, which when translated could be grammatical in L1, in L2 or in both. Thus, the L3 morpho-syntactic structures included in the study were a mismatch with L1, a mismatch with L2, a Double mismatch, with both L1 and L2, or a no mismatch condition. Participants read the English sentences while their eye-movements were recorded (online measure), and they also performed grammaticality judgments following each sentence (offline measure). Across both measures, cross-language influences were assessed by comparing the performance of the trilinguals in each of the critical interference conditions to the no-interference condition, and by comparing their performance to that of the monolingual controls. L1 interference was evident in first pass sentence reading, and marginally in offline grammaticality judgment, and L2 interference was robust across second pass reading and grammaticality judgments. These results suggest that either L1 or the L2 can be the source of cross-language influences in L3 processing, but with different time-courses. The findings highlight the difference between online and offline measures of performance: processing language in real-time reflects mainly automatic activation of morpho-syntactic structures, whereas offline judgments might also involve strategic and meta-linguistic decision making. Together, the findings show that during L3 processing, trilinguals have access to all previously acquired linguistic knowledge, and that the multilingual language system is fully interactive.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The cross-linguistic influence of L1 Korean and L2 English in L3 Spanish syntactic processing
    You, Eunjung
    [J]. ONOMAZEIN, 2024, (63): : 37 - 54
  • [2] The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects
    Scherag, A
    Demuth, L
    Rösler, F
    Neville, HJ
    Röder, B
    [J]. COGNITION, 2004, 93 (03) : B97 - B108
  • [3] L1 and L2 transfer to L3 in L3 and L2 learners of Standard Arabic
    Albirini, Abdulkafi
    Saadah, Eman
    Alhawary, Mohammad T.
    [J]. LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO BILINGUALISM, 2020, 10 (06) : 745 - 774
  • [4] L1, L2 and L3: Same or different?
    Bardel, Camilla
    Falk, Ylva
    [J]. SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2021, 37 (03) : 459 - 464
  • [5] ON THE INFLUENCE OF READING STRATEGIES IN L1 ON TEXT SKILLS IN L2 AND L3
    Palackova, Zuzana
    [J]. BILDUNG UND SPRACHEN IN EUROPA, 2013, 17 : 187 - 194
  • [6] Investigation of Coster-Kronig transition probabilities (L1→L2, L1→L3, and L2→L3) for Hf and Hf compounds
    Cengiz, Erhan
    Apaydin, Gokhan
    Aylikci, Volkan
    Kaya, Necati
    Tirasoglu, Engin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2008, 77 (05)
  • [7] Determination of Coster-Kronig transition probabilities (L1→L2, L1→L3 and L2→L3) for Hg and Bi in molecules
    Sögüt, Ö
    Büyükkasap, E
    Küçükönder, A
    Ertugrul, M
    Erdogan, H
    [J]. X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, 2002, 31 (01) : 71 - 74
  • [8] Influence of size and adsorbates on the L3, L2 and L1 xanes of Pt catalysts
    Miller, Jeffrey T.
    Lei, Yu
    Jelic, Jelena
    Liang, Hong
    Linic, Suljo
    Meyer, Randall
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 240
  • [9] Model Transformation Languages L1, L2, L3 and Their Implementation
    Rencis, Edgars
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING, 2008, 733 : 103 - 139
  • [10] The Relationship between L1/L2 Literacy and L3 Acquisition
    Moghtadi, Laleh
    [J]. CROATIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION-HRVATSKI CASOPIS ZA ODGOJ I OBRAZOVANJE, 2017, 19 (04): : 1233 - 1264