Elevation of the d-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department

被引:4
|
作者
Kwon, Hyojeong [1 ]
Kim, Youn-Jung [1 ]
Her, Eun-Ju [1 ]
Chae, Bora [1 ]
Lee, Yoon-Seon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Coll Med, 88 Olympic Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; d-dimer; Cancer; Diagnosis; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s11739-021-02730-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Recent guidelines for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are based on clinical decision rules and d-dimer. d-dimer measurement is recommended only for patients who are 'PE-unlikely'. We aimed to assess the current guidelines for cancer patients and to determine an optimal d-dimer cut-off level. This retrospective observational study was conducted in the emergency department of Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between 02/2017 and 09/2017 for the development cohort and between 06/2018 and 02/2019 for the validation cohort. Among adult active cancer patients with suspected PE, we included those who were 'PE-unlikely' according to Wells' criteria and who underwent d-dimer testing and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). A total of 498 patients (227 in the development cohort and 271 in the validation cohort) were included, and PE was diagnosed in 8.8% and 18.5% of patients, respectively. The optimal d-dimer cut-off level was 2.0 mu g/mL. This elevated cut-off level showed a much higher specificity of 21.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.2-27.3%) and 21.7% (95% CI 16.8-7.6%) in the development and validation sets, respectively, compared with the specificity of 4.4% (95% CI 2.3-8.1%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2.2-7.6%) using the age-adjusted cut-off. The new d-dimer cut-off value identified unnecessary CTPA for 21.3% of patients (absolute difference, 16.9%, 35 of 207) in the development cohort and 21.7% (absolute difference, 17.6%, 39 of 221) of patients in the validation cohort compared to using the standard age-adjusted cut-off. The elevated d-dimer cut-off value combined with Wells' criteria might reduce unnecessary CTPA in active cancer patients with a 'PE-unlikely' classification. Further clinical trials are warranted to improve the PE diagnostic strategy in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 502
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elevation of the d-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department
    Hyojeong Kwon
    Youn-Jung Kim
    Eun-Ju Her
    Bora Chae
    Yoon-Seon Lee
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2022, 17 : 495 - 502
  • [2] PERFORMANCES OF AGE-ADJUSTED D-DIMER CUT-OFF TO RULE OUT PULMONARY EMBOLISM
    Penaloza, A.
    Roy, P. M.
    Kline, J.
    Verschuren, F.
    Legal, G.
    Quentin-Georget, S.
    Delvau, N.
    Thys, F.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2012, 67 (02): : 142 - 142
  • [3] Performance of age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to rule out pulmonary embolism
    Penaloza, A.
    Roy, P. -M.
    Kline, J.
    Verschuren, F.
    Le Gal, G.
    Quentin-Georget, S.
    Delvau, N.
    Thys, F.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2012, 10 (07) : 1291 - 1296
  • [5] Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cut-off Levels to Rule out Pulmonary Embolism: A Prospective Outcome Study
    Righini, Marc
    den Exter, Paul
    van Es, Josien
    Verschuren, Franck
    Ghuisen, Alexandre
    Rutschman, Olivier
    Schotte, Thibault
    Sanchez, Olivier
    Jaffrelot, Morgan
    Karre, Meissa
    Peudepiece, Pascal
    Schmidt, Jeannot
    Principe, Alessandra
    van Houten, Anja A.
    Ten Wolde, Marije
    Douma, Renee A.
    Hazelaar, Germa
    Erkens, Petra M. G.
    Van Kralingen, Klaas
    Grootenboers, Marco
    Durian, Marc F.
    Cheung, Whitney
    Bounameaux, Henri
    Huisman, Menno V.
    Kamphuisen, Pieter W.
    Le Gal, Gregoire
    BLOOD, 2013, 122 (21)
  • [6] Performance of the age-adjusted cut-off for D-dimer in patients with cancer and suspected pulmonary embolism
    Wilts, I. T.
    Le Gal, G.
    Den Exter, P. L.
    Van Es, J.
    Carrier, M.
    Planquette, B.
    Buller, H. R.
    Righini, M.
    Huisman, M. V.
    Kamphuisen, P. W.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2017, 152 : 49 - 51
  • [7] Should the D-dimer cut-off value be increased in elderly patients suspected of pulmonary embolism?
    Righini, M
    de Moerloose, P
    Reber, G
    Perrier, A
    Bounameaux, H
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2001, 85 (04) : 744 - 744
  • [8] Augmenting D-dimer Testing for Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out in the Emergency Department With Artificial Intelligence
    Haimovich, A.
    Lopez, K.
    Forman, H.
    Kline, J.
    Venkatesh, A.
    Taylor, R.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (04) : S29 - S30
  • [9] Clinical usefulness of adjusted D-dimer cut-off values to exclude pulmonary embolism in a community hospital emergency department patient population
    Vossen, Josephina A.
    Albrektson, Joshua
    Sensarma, Anirban
    Williams, Scott C.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2012, 53 (07) : 765 - 768
  • [10] D-dimer cut-off value for pulmonary embolism diagnosis in COVID-19
    Engels, Sophie Y. H.
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2024, 16 (04) : 2707 - 2708