Sexual function following pelvic fracture urethral injury and posterior urethroplasty

被引:6
|
作者
Mazzone, Andrew [1 ]
Anderson, Ross [2 ]
Voelzke, Bryan B. [3 ]
Vanni, Alex J. [4 ]
Elliott, Sean P. [5 ]
Breyer, Benjamin N. [6 ]
Erickson, Bradley A. [7 ]
Buckley, Jill [8 ]
Myers, Jeremy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Urol Nevada, Reno, NV USA
[3] Spokane Reg Hlth Dist, Spokane, WA USA
[4] Lahey Hosp & Med Ctr Burlington, Burlington, MA USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA
[8] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
Erectile dysfunction (ED); pelvic fracture; sexual function; trauma; urethroplasty; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; SUPRAPUBIC CYSTOSTOMY; MANAGEMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; REALIGNMENT; TRAUMA; RISK; EXPERIENCE; PERINEAL; REPAIR;
D O I
10.21037/tau-20-1287
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To evaluate erectile and sexual function after pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) by performing a retrospective review of a large multi-center database. We hypothesized that most men will have erectile dysfunction (ED) and poor sexual function following PFUI, which will remain after posterior urethroplasty. Methods: Using the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Networks of Surgeons (TURNS) database, we identified PFUI patients undergoing posterior urethroplasty. We excluded patients with incomplete demographic, surgical and/or questionnaire data. Sexual Health Inventory of Men (SHIM), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ), and subjective changes in penile curvature were collected before urethroplasty surgery and at follow-up. We performed descriptive statistics for erectile and ejaculatory function using STATA v12. Results: We identified 92 men meeting inclusion criteria; median age was 41.7 years and BMI was 26.5. The mechanism of injury was blunt in all patients, and average distraction defect length was 2.3 cm (SD 1.0 cm). In the 38 patients who completed both pre and post-operative SHIM questionnaires, the mean SI MM. score was 10.5 (SD 7.0), with 63% having severe ED (SHIM <12). The median follow-up was 5.6 months and the mean post-operative SHIM was 9.3 (SD 6.5), with 68% having severe ED. The mean change in SHIM score was -1.18 (SD 6.29) with 6 (16%) patients reporting de novo ED (>.5 point decrease in score). Of the men with pre-operative MSHQ data, 46/74 (62.1%) had difficulty with ejaculation, 25/35 (71%) had change in penile length, and 6/33 (18%) reported penile curvature. In men with post-operative MSHQ, 19/44 (43%) expressed difficulty with ejaculation, 23/32 (72%) had change in penile length, and 9/33 (27%) reported penile curvature. Conclusions: There is a high rate of severe ED, both following PFUI and remaining after posterior urethroplasty. Additionally, rates of ejaculatory difficulty and patient perceived changes in penile length and curvature underscore the complex nature of the impact of these injuries on sexual function beyond simple erectile function.
引用
收藏
页码:2043 / 2050
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: POSTERIOR URETHROPLASTY FOR PELVIC FRACTURE URETHRAL URETHRAL INJURY
    Aube, Melanie
    Virasoro, Ramon
    McCammon, Kurt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E585 - E585
  • [2] Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury
    Johnsen, Niels Vass
    Moses, Rachel A.
    Elliott, Sean P.
    Vanni, Alex J.
    Baradaran, Nima
    Greear, Garrick
    Smith, Thomas G.
    Granieri, Michael A.
    Alsikafi, Nejd F.
    Erickson, Bradley A.
    Myers, Jeremy B.
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    Buckley, Jill C.
    Zhao, Lee C.
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 1073 - 1079
  • [3] Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury
    Niels Vass Johnsen
    Rachel A. Moses
    Sean P. Elliott
    Alex J. Vanni
    Nima Baradaran
    Garrick Greear
    Thomas G. Smith
    Michael A. Granieri
    Nejd F. Alsikafi
    Bradley A. Erickson
    Jeremy B. Myers
    Benjamin N. Breyer
    Jill C. Buckley
    Lee C. Zhao
    Bryan B. Voelzke
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 1073 - 1079
  • [4] Assessment of erectile function in pelvic fracture urethral injury following progressive perineal urethroplasty
    Parmar, K.
    Yadav, A. K.
    Dewana, S.
    Kumar, S. K.
    Singh, S. K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1600 - S1600
  • [5] Posterior Urethroplasty following Pelvic Fracture
    Marks, Phillip
    Dahlem, Roland
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2021, 52 (03)
  • [6] Delayed Posterior Urethroplasty Following Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Do We Have to Wait 3 Months?
    Scarberry, Kyle
    Bonomo, Jose
    Gomez, Reynaldo G.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2018, 116 : 193 - 197
  • [7] Erectile function after posterior urethroplasty for pelvic fracture-urethral distraction defect injuries
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    Sherman, Neil D.
    Dielubanza, Elodi
    Webster, George D.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (08) : 1126 - 1129
  • [8] Could the bulbar urethral end location on the cystourethrogram predict the outcome after posterior urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury?
    Harraz, Ahmed M.
    Nabeeh, Adel
    Elbaz, Ramy
    Abdelhamid, Abdalla
    Tharwat, Mohamed
    Elbakry, Amr A.
    El-Hefnawy, Ahmed S.
    El-Assmy, Ahmed
    Mosbah, Ahmed
    Zahran, Mohamed H.
    [J]. ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 21 (02) : 94 - 101
  • [9] OUTCOMES FOLLOWING POSTERIOR URETHROPLASTY FOR PELVIC-FRACTURE URETHRAL INJURIES: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
    Johnsen, Niels
    Myers, Jeremy
    Elliott, Sean
    Vanni, Alex
    Baradaran, Nima
    Greear, Garrick
    Smith, Thomas, III
    Granieri, Michael
    Alsikafi, Nejd
    Erickson, Bradley
    Breyer, Benjamin
    Buckley, Jill
    Zhao, Lee
    Voelzke, Bryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E67 - E67
  • [10] Re: Delayed Posterior Urethroplasty following Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Do we Have to Wait 3 Months? Editorial Comment
    Morey, Allen F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (06): : 1158 - 1158