Future CO2 Emissions Allowances and Inequality Assessment under Different Allocation Regimes

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Lining [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Ding [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Wenying [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Key Res Inst Humanities & Social Sci Univ, Res Ctr Contemporary Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Climate change; IPCC fifth assessment report (WGI); emission rights allocation regimes; carbon emissions inequality;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1162
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Summary for Policymakers of Working Group I (WGI) contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) presents three probabilities with different cumulative emissions to limit the global temperature rise to 2 degrees C or less. In this paper, based on the latest information, allocation quotas for major countries and regions were determined under typical schemes between 2011 and 2100. It was found that the countries' allocation quotas all increase with enlarging global emissions permit but with different growth rates under each allocation regime, and given global emission permit, changing in scheme parameters also has some impact on each country's allocation quota. Allocation regimes were also evaluated from the perspective of equality based on cumulative emission per capita, finding that the regimes considering historical responsibility for emissions can effectively reduce the inequalities of global emissions; And regimes incorporating ability to pay are useful in further reducing emissions inequalities between Annex I and non-Annex I groups. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 526
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SELECTED PROBLEMS OF THE ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION ECONOMICS AND ALLOCATION OF CO2 EMISSIONS ALLOWANCES
    Suwala, Wojciech
    Kudelko, Mariusz
    [J]. RYNEK ENERGII, 2009, (02): : 2 - 16
  • [2] Future Inequality in CO2 Emissions and the Impact of Abatement Proposals
    Mark T. Heil
    Quentin T. Wodon
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000, 17 : 163 - 181
  • [3] Future inequality in CO2 emissions and the impact of abatement proposals
    Heil, MT
    Wodon, QT
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (02): : 163 - 181
  • [4] Assessment of different approaches in reducing co2 emissions
    Ghadreri, Abdolvahed
    Sharifara, Ehsan
    Shahri, Abbas Abbaszadeh
    Vadayekheiri, Amirmehdi
    [J]. LIFE SCIENCE JOURNAL-ACTA ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY OVERSEAS EDITION, 2012, 9 (04): : 1969 - 1978
  • [5] Managing emissions allowances of electricity producers to maximize CO2 abatement: DEA models for analyzing emissions and allocating emissions allowances
    Mahdiloo, Mandi
    Ngwenyama, Ojelanki
    Scheepers, Rens
    Tamaddoni, Ali
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2018, 205 : 244 - 255
  • [6] CO2 emissions in a soil under different tillage practices
    Muhlbachova, Gabriela
    Kusa, Helena
    Ruzek, Pavel
    Vavera, Radek
    [J]. PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 68 (06) : 253 - 261
  • [7] The allocation of CO2 emissions as a claims problem
    Duro, Juan Antonio
    Gimenez-Gomez, Jose-Manuel
    Vilella, Cori
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 86
  • [8] An effective allocation criterion for CO2 emissions
    Gupta, S
    Bhandari, PM
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (12) : 727 - 736
  • [10] A COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT OPTIONS TO REDUCE CO2 EMISSIONS
    MESSNER, S
    NAKICENOVIC, N
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1992, 33 (5-8) : 763 - 771