Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology

被引:70
|
作者
Luke, Barbara [1 ]
Gopal, Daksha [2 ]
Cabral, Howard [2 ]
Stern, Judy E. [3 ]
Diop, Hafsatou [4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lebanon, NH USA
[4] Massachusetts Dept Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
adverse pregnancy outcomes; assisted reproductive technology; infertility; subfertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; POPULATION-BASED COHORT; TERM HEALTH OUTCOMES; BODY-MASS INDEX; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; ADVERSE PREGNANCY; SINGLETON PREGNANCIES; CHILDREN BORN; INFERTILITY TREATMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Births to subfertile women, with and without infertility treatment, have been reported to have lower birthweights and shorter gestations, even when limited to singletons. It is unknown whether these decrements are due to parental characteristics or aspects of infertility treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of maternal fertility status on the risk of pregnancy, birth, and infant complications. STUDY DESIGN: All singleton live births of >= 22 weeks' gestation and >= 350 g birthweight to Massachusetts resident women in 2004-2010 were linked to hospital discharge and vital records. Women were categorized by their fertility status as in vitro fertilization, subfertile, or fertile. Women whose births linked to in vitro fertilization cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System were classified as in vitro fertilization. Women with indicators of subfertility but not treated with in vitro fertilization were classified as subfertile. Women without indicators of subfertility or in vitro fertilization treatment were classified as fertile. Risks of 15 adverse outcomes (gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, antenatal bleeding, placental complications [placenta abruptio and placenta previa], prenatal hospitalizations, primary cesarean delivery, very low birthweight [< 1500 g], low birthweight [< 2500 g], small-for-gestation birthweight [z-score <= -1.28], large-for-gestation birthweight [z-score >= 1.28], very preterm [< 32 weeks], preterm [< 37 weeks], birth defects, neonatal death [0-27 days], and infant death [0-364 days of life]) were modeled by fertility status with the fertile group as reference and the subfertile group as reference, using multivariate log binomial regression and reported as adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The study population included 459,623 women (441,420 fertile, 8054 subfertile, and 10,149 in vitro fertilization). Women in the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups were older than their fertile counterparts. Risks for 6 of 6 pregnancy outcomes and 6 of 9 infant outcomes were increased for the subfertile group, and 5 of 6 pregnancy outcomes and 7 of 9 infant outcomes were increased for the in vitro fertilization group. For 4 of the 6 pregnancy outcomes (uterine bleeding, placental complications, prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean) and 2 of the infant outcomes (low birthweight and preterm) the risk was greater in the in vitro fertilization group, with nonoverlapping confidence intervals to the subfertile group, indicating a substantially higher risk among in vitro fertilizationetreated women. The highest risks for the in vitro fertilization women were uterine bleeding (adjusted risk ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 3.31-4.36) and placental complications (adjusted risk ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.57-3.08), and for in vitro fertilization infants, very preterm birth (adjusted risk ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.52), and very low birthweight (adjusted risk ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.56). With subfertile women as reference, risks for the in vitro fertilization group were significantly increased for uterine bleeding, placental complications, prenatal hospitalizations, primary cesarean delivery, low and very low birthweight, and preterm and very preterm birth. CONCLUSION: These analyses indicate that, compared with fertile women, subfertile and in vitro fertilizationetreated women tend to be older, have more preexisting chronic conditions, and are at higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly uterine bleeding and placental complications. The greater risk in in vitro fertilizationetreated women may reflect more severe infertility, more extensive underlying pathology, or other unfavorable factors not measured in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:327.e1 / 327.e14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Luke, Barbara
    Gopal, Daksha
    Cabral, Howard
    Stern, Judy E.
    Diop, Hafsatou
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (03) : 330.e1 - 330.e15
  • [2] MATERNAL PREGNANCY AND BIRTH COMPLICATIONS BY FERTILITY STATUS: THE MASSACHUSETTS OUTCOMES STUDY OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
    Luke, B.
    Gopal, D.
    Stern, J. E.
    Declercq, E.
    Hoang, L.
    Kotelchuck, M.
    Diop, H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E15 - E15
  • [3] MATERNAL PREGNANCY AND BIRTH COMPLICATIONS BY PLURALITY: THE MASSACHUSETTS OUTCOMES STUDY OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
    Luke, B.
    Gopal, D.
    Stern, J. E.
    Declercq, E.
    Hoang, L.
    Kotelchuck, M.
    Diop, H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E17 - E17
  • [4] Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART)
    Declercq, Eugene
    Luke, Barbara
    Belanoff, Candice
    Cabral, Howard
    Diop, Hafsatou
    Gopal, Daksha
    Hoang, Lan
    Kotelchuck, Milton
    Stern, Judy E.
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (04) : 888 - 895
  • [5] THE OCCURRENCE OF BIRTH DEFECTS IN RELATION TO ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE MASSACHUSETTS OUTCOMES STUDY OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY DATABASE.
    Getz, K. D.
    Liberman, R. F.
    Luke, B.
    Stern, J. E.
    Declercq, E.
    Anderka, M. T.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (03) : E4 - E4
  • [6] The Occurrence of Birth Defects in Relation to Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART) Database
    Getz, K. D.
    Liberman, R. F.
    Luke, B.
    Stern, J. E.
    Declercq, E. R.
    Anderka, M. T.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2015, 103 (05) : 356 - 356
  • [7] A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts
    Schieve, Laura A.
    Cohen, Bruce
    Nannini, Angela
    Ferre, Cynthia
    Reynolds, Meredith A.
    Zhang, Zi
    Jeng, Gary
    Macaluso, Maurizio
    Wright, Victoria C.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2007, 11 (06) : 517 - 525
  • [8] A Population-Based Study of Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Assisted Reproductive Technology in Massachusetts
    Laura A. Schieve
    Bruce Cohen
    Angela Nannini
    Cynthia Ferre
    Meredith A. Reynolds
    Zi Zhang
    Gary Jeng
    Maurizio Macaluso
    Victoria C. Wright
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2007, 11 : 517 - 525
  • [9] BIRTH OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES: FINDINGS FROM THE MASSACHUSETTS OUTCOMES STUDY OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES (MOSART).
    Declercq, E.
    Cabral, H.
    Diop, H.
    Kotelchuck, M.
    Luke, B.
    Stern, J. E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S50 - S51
  • [10] Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcomes
    Helmerhorst, F. M.
    Keirse, M. J. N. C.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (08) : 1329 - 1329