Informed Public Opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

被引：32

作者：

de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein ^{[1
]}

Daamen, Dancker ^{[1
]}

Ramirez, Andrea Ramirez ^{[2
]}

Faaij, Andre ^{[2
]}

Hendriks, Chris ^{[3
]}

de Visser, Erika ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Psychol, Ctr Energy & Environm Studies, Wassenaarseweg 52, NL-2333 AK Leiden, Netherlands

[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst, Grp Sci Technol & Soc, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands

[3] Ecofys, NL-3526 KL Utrecht, Netherlands

来源：

GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9 | 2009年 / 1卷 / 01期

关键词：

ICQ; public opinion; public perception; CCS; acceptance; choice; information; CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.306

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

In this study, an Information-Choice Questionnaire (ICQ) was used to find out how a representative sample of the Dutch public (n=971) would evaluate and choose between seven mitigation options after having been thoroughly informed. The results suggest that due to the comparison with other mitigation options, people are less positive about CCS options. Still, only few respondents firmly reject the CCS options. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：4795 / 4802

页数：8

共 50 条

[1] Informed public opinion in the Netherlands: Evaluation of CO2 capture and storage technologies in comparison with other CO2 mitigation options
de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein
Daamen, Dancker
Ramirez, Andrea Ramirez
Faaij, Andre
Hendriks, Chris
de Visser, Erika
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 10 : 169 - 180
[2] Informed Public Preferences for Electricity Portfolios with CCS and Other Low-Carbon Technologies
Fleishman, Lauren A.
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine
Morgan, M. Granger
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (09) : 1399 - 1410
[3] Impacts of CCS and Other CO2 Mitigation Options on China's Electric Power Industry
Liu, Tong
Xu, Gang
Liu, Xing
Cai, Peng
Tian, Longhu
Huang, Qili
2010 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2010,
[4] A comparison of techniques used to collect informed public opinions about CCS: Opinion quality after focus group discussions versus information-choice questionnaires
ter Mors, Emma
Terwel, Bart W.
Daamen, Dancker D. L.
Reiner, David M.
Schumann, Diana
Anghel, Sorin
Boulouta, Ioanna
Cismaru, Diana M.
Constantin, Carmencita
de Jager, Chris C. H.
Dudu, Alexandra
Esken, Andrea
Falup, Oana C.
Firth, Rebecca M.
Gemeni, Vassiliki
Hendriks, Chris
Ivan, Loredana
Koukouzas, Nikolaos
Markos, Angelos
Naess, Robert
Pietzner, Katja
Samoila, Irene R.
Sava, Constantin S.
Stephenson, Michael H.
Tomescu, Claudia E.
Torvatn, Hans Y.
Tvedt, Sturle D.
Vallentin, Daniel
West, Julia M.
Ziogou, Fotini
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 18 : 256 - 263
[5] Knowledge and collective preferences - A comparison of two approaches to estimating the opinions of a better informed public
Sturgis, P
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (04) : 453 - 485
[6] A study on roles of public survey and focus groups to assess public opinions for CCS implementation
Itaoka, Kenshi
Saito, Aya
Akai, Makoto
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 6330 - 6337
[7] A comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options
Reck, RA
Hoag, KJ
ENERGY, 1997, 22 (2-3) : 115 - 120
[8] Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public
Sturgis, P
Cooper, H
Fife-Schaw, C
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2005, 24 (01) : 31 - 56
[9] A critical test of the choice questionnaire for collecting informed public opinions
Corinne A. Van der Salm
Daan van Knippenberg
Dancker D.L. Daamen
Quality and Quantity, 1997, 31 : 193 - 197
[10] A critical test of the choice questionnaire for collecting informed public opinions
VanderSalm, CA
VanKnippenberg, D
Daamen, DDL
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 1997, 31 (02) : 193 - 197

← 1 2 3 4 5 →