Biosafety, stability, and osteogenic activity of novel implants made of Zr70Ni16Cu6Al8 bulk metallic glass for biomedical application

Superior mechanical and chemical properties of Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) bulk metallic glass (BMG) demonstrate its promise as a novel biomaterial for fabrication of implants. The aim of the present study was to validate mechanical, chemical, and biological properties of Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG through comparison with titanium (Ti). Our data indicated higher tensile strength, lower Young's modulus, and reduced metal ion release of Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG compared with Ti. Biosafety of bone marrow mesenchymal cells on Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG was comparable to that of Ti. Next, screw-type implant prototypes made of Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG were fabricated and inserted into rat long bones. Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG implants indicated a higher removal-torque value and lower Periotest value compared with Ti implants. In addition, higher amounts of new bone formation and osseointegration were observed around Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG implants compared with Ti implants. Moreover, gene expression analysis displayed higher expression of osteoblast- and osteoclast-associated genes in the Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG group compared with the Ti group. Importantly, loading to implants upregulated bone formation, as well as osteoblast- and osteoclast-associated gene expression in the peri-implant area. No significant difference in concentrations of Ni, Al, Cu, and Zr in various organs was shown between in the Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG and Ti groups. Collectively, these findings suggest that Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG is suitable for fabricating novel implants with superior mechanical properties, biocompatibility, stability, and biosafety compared with Ti. Statement of Significance Titanium is widely used to fabricate orthopedic and dental implants. However, Titanium has disadvantages for biomedical applications in regard to strength, elasticity, and biosafety. Recently, we developed a novel hypoeutectic Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG, which has superior mechanical and chemical properties. However, the validity of Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG for biomedical application has not been cleared. The aim of the present study was to validate the mechanical, chemical, and biological properties of Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG for biomedical applications through comparison with Titanium. The present study clarifies that Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG has good mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and osteogenic activity, which are necessary features for biomedical applications. The present study provides for the first time the superiority of Zr(70)Ni(16)Cu(6)A(18) BMG implants to Titanium implants for biomedical applications. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.