The Predictive Ability of the Glasgow Prognostic Score and Variants in Both Deceased Donor and Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Agalar, C. [1 ]
Egeli, T. [1 ]
Unek, T. [1 ]
Ozbilgin, M. [1 ]
Aysal, A. [2 ]
Cevlik, A. D. [1 ]
Sagol, O. [2 ]
Bacakoglu, A. [1 ]
Ellidokuz, H. [3 ]
Astarcioglu, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Sch Med, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Prevent Oncol, Sch Med, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; CURATIVE RESECTION; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.004
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Aim. Liver transplantation (LT) is the most promising treatment method in hepatocellular cancer (HCC). Due to the shortage of organ donors and the possible risks associated with living donation, the selection of patients for LT is critical. The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive ability of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified GPS (mGPS), and hepatic GPS (hGPS) on prognoses in a patient group who underwent deceased donor LT (DDLT) or living-donor LT (LDLT) for HCC. Patients and Methods. This study includes 62 DDLT and 55 LDLT patients who underwent LT for HCC between 1998 and 2016 in a single center. The study endpoints were recurrence, 0- to 1-year mortality, 0- to 3-year mortality, mortality, and overall survival (OS). Results. The median follow-up time was 70.24 +/- 48.47 months. GPS and hGPS positivity were found to be prognostic indicators of 0- to 3-year mortality and overall mortality in DDLT (P = .012, P = .006; P = .044 and P = .022 respectively). In the LDLT group, GPS was found to be effective in predicting 0- to 1-year and 0- to 3-year mortality (P = .045, P = .022 respectively); GPS and hGPS were also found to be effective in predicting overall mortality (P = .001 and P = .046 respectively). The OS was significantly longer in the GPS 0 group and hGPS 0 group compared to the GPS 1-2 and hGPS 1-2 group in both DDLT and LDLT. Conclusion. The findings of this study and the literature indicate that using GPS and hGPS is appropriate in selecting patients with HCC who are candidates for LT.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1138
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Glasgow Prognostic Score and its variants predict mortality in living donor but not in deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A double-center validation study
    Kaltenborn, Alexander
    Schrem, Harald
    Reichert, Benedikt
    Braun, Felix
    Emmanouilidis, Nikos
    Klempnauer, Juergen
    Becker, Thomas
    Heits, Nils
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 47 (08) : 783 - 792
  • [2] The Glasgow Prognostic Score and Its Variants Predict Mortality in Living Donor but Not in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Double-Center Validation Study
    Kaltenborn, A.
    Gwiasda, J.
    Heits, N.
    Braun, F.
    Schrem, H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 434 - 434
  • [3] Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Fonseca, Eduardo
    Seda, Joao
    Benavides, Marcel
    Candido, Helry
    Carballo, Rogerio
    Kondo, Mario
    Chapchap, Paulo
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 : S145 - S145
  • [4] The prognostic impacts of donor gender in deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Okubo, K.
    Sasaki, K.
    Moro, A.
    Fujiki, M.
    Uso, Diago T.
    Eghtesad, B.
    Kwon, D.
    Miller, C.
    Quintini, C.
    Hashimoto, K.
    Aucejo, F.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (08) : 357 - 358
  • [5] Usefulness of the prognostic score for donor safety in living donor liver transplantation
    Sekido, H
    Matsuo, K
    Takeda, K
    Sugita, M
    Morioka, D
    Kubota, T
    Tanaka, K
    Endo, I
    Togo, S
    Shimada, H
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (08) : 2219 - 2221
  • [7] Outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by liver transplantation: comparison of living donor and deceased donor transplantation
    Li, Chuan
    Wen, Tian-Fu
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    Li, Bo
    Yang, Jia-Ying
    Wang, Wen-Tao
    Xu, Ming-Qing
    Wei, Yong-Gang
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 9 (04) : 366 - 369
  • [8] Living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation for early irresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Lo, C. M.
    Fan, S. T.
    Liu, C. L.
    Chan, S. C.
    Ng, I. O. -L.
    Wong, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [9] Living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Liang, Wenhua
    Wu, Linwei
    Ling, Xiaoting
    Schroder, Paul M.
    Ju, Weiqiang
    Wang, Dongping
    Shang, Yushu
    Kong, Yuan
    Guo, Zhiyong
    He, Xiaoshun
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (10) : 1226 - 1236
  • [10] Living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparable survival and recurrence
    Sandhu, Lakhbir
    Sandroussi, Charbel
    Guba, Markus
    Selzner, Markus
    Ghanekar, Anand
    Cattral, Mark S.
    McGilvray, Ian D.
    Levy, Gary
    Greig, Paul D.
    Renner, Eberhard L.
    Grant, David R.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (03) : 315 - 322