Emergency Department Experience With Nonoral Contrast Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Patients for Appendicitis

被引:5
|
作者
Glauser, Jonathan [1 ]
Siff, Jonathan [1 ]
Emerman, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
emergency department; appendicitis; computed tomography; SUSPECTED ACUTE APPENDICITIS; NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY RATE; HELICAL CT; RECTAL CONTRAST; ORAL CONTRAST; DIAGNOSIS; MISDIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/PTS.0b013e31829a07ba
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Objectives: The American College of Radiology lists oral contrast as an institution-specific option in the evaluation of right lower quadrant pain. Previous literature indicates that an accurate assessment for appendicitis can be made by CT using IV contrast alone, with significant time savings from withholding oral contrast. Before 2010, the protocol for CT use in the evaluation of possible appendicitis or undifferentiated abdominal pain routinely included oral contrast. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of repeat CT scans with oral contrast for the purpose of arriving at a final disposition in patients undergoing evaluation for abdominal pain. This analysis was also to determine if the general surgery service was willing and able to make accurate clinical determinations to operate without the use of oral contrast. Methods: Consecutive abdominal CTs for nontraumatic abdominal pain were evaluated retrospectively over a 7-month period from January through July 2010. CT scans performed for evaluation of trauma were eliminated, as were cases in patients with known previous appendectomy or in cases in which appendicitis was not a consideration. Follow-up was by chart review over the ensuing 30 days for complications or need for surgery, which was not detected after the initial CT scan. The study was conducted at a teaching hospital, level I trauma center with an annual ED census of 99,000 visits. Results: A total of 311 CT scans met the study criteria. No cases of appendicitis were missed. Two patients were operated on based upon inflammatory findings in the right lower quadrant, one with typhlitis, the second with possible inflammatory bowel disease versus typhlitis. In each case, the diagnosis was made by CT, but the surgery service chose to operate based on clinical findings. Sixteen (5.14%; 95% CI, 3.2%-8.2%) cases of acute appendicitis were accurately identified. A normal appendix was visualized in 125 (40.2 %; 95% CI, 34.9-45.7) patients. No patients (0%; 95% CI, 0%-1.2%) required a repeat CT scan with oral contrast as part of the workup. On 30-day follow-up by chart review, no (0%; 95% CI, 0%-1.2%) significant surgical problems were identified, and no cases of missed appendicitis were identified. Conclusions: Abdominal CT scan without the use of oral contrast is accurate to allow for appropriate decision making by emergency physicians and general surgeons. In our series, no patients required repeat scanning. Further assessment by larger studies is appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emergency Department Experience With Non-Oral Contrast In the Evaluation of Patients for Appendicitis
    Glauser, J.
    Emerman, C.
    Siff, J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (03) : S19 - S19
  • [2] Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis
    Torbati, SS
    Guss, DA
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (08) : 823 - 829
  • [3] Emergency Department Use of Contrast Computed Tomography in Patients With Renal Dysfunction
    Newberry, Brittany M.
    Evans, Dian Dowling
    ADVANCED EMERGENCY NURSING JOURNAL, 2018, 40 (01) : 2 - 7
  • [4] Intravenous and Oral Contrast vs Intravenous Contrast Alone Computed Tomography for the Visualization of Appendix and Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Adult Emergency Department Patients
    Wadhwani, Aman
    Guo, Lancia
    Saude, Erik
    Els, Hein
    Lang, Eddie
    McRae, Andrew
    Bhayana, Deepak
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2016, 67 (03): : 234 - 241
  • [5] Influence of Physician Experience on Computed Tomography Utilization in the Emergency Department
    Diallo, A.
    Katz, R.
    Boccio, E.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 84 (04) : S5 - S5
  • [6] Computed tomography in the emergency department
    Sosna, J
    Slasky, BS
    BarZiv, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 15 (03): : 244 - 247
  • [7] Computed tomography in the Emergency Department
    Belina-Tomkiewicz, Beata
    Drozd, Miroslaw
    Guz, Wieslaw
    Samojedny, Antoni
    Ralowska, Malgorzata
    Kosydar, Krzysztof
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 79 : S23 - S27
  • [8] Contrast-induced Nephropathy in Emergency Department Patients Receiving Abdominal Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography
    Kim, K. S.
    Kim, K.
    Jo, Y. H.
    Lee, C. C.
    Kim, T. Y.
    Rhee, J. E.
    Suh, G. J.
    Lee, S. W.
    Singer, A. J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 52 (04) : S136 - S136
  • [9] Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography for Emergency Department diagnosis of appendicitis: A systematic review
    Turner, TWS
    Wiebe, N
    Cramer, K
    Hartling, L
    Klassen, TP
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 128A - 129A
  • [10] EVALUATION OF THE HEAD MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Zadravec, Dijana
    Greguric, Tomislav
    Smoljan, Mia
    Mustapic, Matej
    Milicic, Gordana
    Jovic, Andrijana
    Rubil, Danijela
    Tomasovic, Daniela
    Kes, Vanja Basic
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2017, 56 (02) : 284 - 291