The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study

被引:11
|
作者
Gagliardi, Diana [1 ]
Rondinone, Bruna M. [1 ]
Mirabile, Marco [1 ]
Buresti, Giuliana [1 ]
Ellwood, Peter [2 ]
Hery, Michel [3 ]
Paszkiewicz, Peter [4 ]
Valenti, Antonio [1 ]
Iavicoli, Sergio [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Insurance Work Accidents INAIL, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, Monte Porzio Catone, Italy
[2] Foresight Ctr, Hlth & Safety Execut, Buxton, England
[3] Natl Inst Res & Safety INRS, Foresight Unit, Paris, France
[4] German Social Accid Insurance IFA, Inst Occupat Safety & Hlth, St Augustin, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
RESEARCH PRIORITIES; MEDICINE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points of view of European occupational safety and health (OSH) researchers. The objective is to identify priorities for OSH research that may contribute to the achievement of present and future sustainable growth objectives set by the European strategies. Methods The study was carried out using a modified Delphi method with a two-round survey. Each round involved a panel of about 110 researchers representing the network member institutes was selected according to specific criteria, including the ownership of research expertise in at least one of the four macroareas identified by the reference report developed by EU-OSHA in 2013. Results The study identified some innovative research topics (for example, 'Emerging technological devices' and 'OSH consequences of markets integration') and research priorities (ie, crowdsourcing, e-work, zero-hours contracts) that are not reflected in previous studies of this nature. The absence of any reference to violence and harassment at work among the researchers' proposals is a major difference from previous similar studies, while topics related to gender issues and electromagnetic fields show a lower importance. Conclusions The innovative design of a research priorities identification process, which takes advantage of a large, representative and qualified panel of European researchers allowed the definition of a number of research priorities able to support the inclusion of innovative OSH research issues in the scope of the next European research agenda.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] A European Research Agenda for Geriatric Emergency Medicine: a modified Delphi study
    Simon P. Mooijaart
    Christian H. Nickel
    Simon P. Conroy
    Jacinta A. Lucke
    Lisa S. van Tol
    Mareline Olthof
    Laura C. Blomaard
    Bianca M. Buurman
    Zerrin D. Dundar
    Bas de Groot
    Beatrice Gasperini
    Pieter Heeren
    Mehmet A. Karamercan
    Rosa McNamara
    Aine Mitchell
    James D. van Oppen
    F. Javier Martin Sanchez
    Yvonne Schoon
    Katrin Singler
    Renan Spode
    Sigrun Skúldóttir
    Thordis Thorrsteindottir
    Marije van der Velde
    James Wallace
    [J]. European Geriatric Medicine, 2021, 12 : 413 - 422
  • [2] A European Research Agenda for Geriatric Emergency Medicine: a modified Delphi study
    Mooijaart, Simon P.
    Nickel, Christian H.
    Conroy, Simon P.
    Lucke, Jacinta A.
    van Tol, Lisa S.
    Olthof, Mareline
    Blomaard, Laura C.
    Buurman, Bianca M.
    Dundar, Zerrin D.
    de Groot, Bas
    Gasperini, Beatrice
    Heeren, Pieter
    Karamercan, Mehmet A.
    McNamara, Rosa
    Mitchell, Aine
    van Oppen, James D.
    Sanchez, F. Javier Martin
    Schoon, Yvonne
    Singler, Katrin
    Spode, Renan
    Skuldottir, Sigrun
    Thorrsteindottir, Thordis
    van der Velde, Marije
    Wallace, James
    [J]. EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (02) : 413 - 422
  • [3] Current research priorities for UK occupational physicians and occupational health researchers: a modified Delphi study
    Lalloo, Drushca
    Demou, Evangelia
    Smedley, Julia
    Madan, Ira
    Asanati, Kaveh
    Macdonald, Ewan Beaton
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 75 (11) : 830 - 836
  • [4] PEROSH: Partnership for European Research in Occupational Safety and Health
    Treutlein, Daniela
    [J]. GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2015, 75 (7-8): : 253 - 253
  • [5] How can European institutes in occupational safety and health respond to future needs?
    Bieneck, HJ
    Elsler, D
    Kuhn, KL
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2005, : 72 - 75
  • [6] Comparison of the Occupational Therapy Research Agenda With the National Institutes of Health Road map for Medical Research
    Bear-Lehman, Jane
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2012, 66 (02): : 250 - 253
  • [7] Towards Bamako: a European perspective on the global health research agenda
    McKee, Martin
    Ricciardi, Walter
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 18 (02): : 107 - 108
  • [8] Towards a Transnational Sexual Health Research and Policy Agenda: the European Sexual Medicine Network Delphi Study
    Joke Dupont
    Marie Chollier
    Tomislav Meštrović
    Ethel Quayle
    Asal Skrenes
    Alexis Dewaele
    [J]. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2022, 19 : 1888 - 1903
  • [9] Towards a Transnational Sexual Health Research and Policy Agenda: the European Sexual Medicine Network Delphi Study
    Dupont, Joke
    Chollier, Marie
    Mestrovic, Tomislav
    Quayle, Ethel
    Skrenes, Asal
    Dewaele, Alexis
    [J]. SEXUALITY RESEARCH AND SOCIAL POLICY, 2022, 19 (04) : 1888 - 1903
  • [10] The intervention research process in occupational safety and health: An overview from the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research Team
    Goldenhar, LM
    LaMontagne, AD
    Katz, T
    Heaney, C
    Landsbergis, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 43 (07) : 616 - 622