St Jude versus CarboMedics®:: follow-up after prosthetic valve replacement

Background. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term outcome of patients with two types of mechanical bileaflet heart valves operated on in the same institution by the same group of surgeons. Methods. A comparative analysis was made in 229 consecutive patients receiving either the St. Jude Medical (SJM) or CarboMedics (CMS) bileaflet mechanical valve in 1990-1991. There were no differences in the preoperative demographics between the two groups. At operations simultaneous coronary bypass operation was performed in 40 patients out of 134 (30%) in the SJM group and 95 (44%) in the CMS group (p=0.026). Sixteen patients in the SJM group underwent replacement of the ascending aorta with a composite graft and none in the CMS group. Results. There was no difference in hospital mortality between the SJM (6.7%) and CMS (6.3%) groups or in other immediate postoperative complications. The patients were followed up to 32 months. There were more patients in the NYHA class I and II in the CMS group (88%) than in the SJM group (69%), p<0.002. Three were II thromboembolic events (0.051% per patient year) in the SJM group and one thromboembolic event (0.008% per patient year) in the CMS group. There were no other differences between the groups in long-term survival, rate of bleeding, infective endocarditis or perivalvular leakage. Conclusions. With the exception of a Little more favourable exercise tolerance and fewer thromboembolic events in the CMS group there were no other differences in the outcome of patients with these two types of bileaflet mechanical valves.