Complications in pediatric urological laparoscopy: Results of a survey

被引:81
|
作者
Peters, CA
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1996年 / 155卷 / 03期
关键词
peritoneoscopy; evaluation studies; pediatrics; physician's practice patterns;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66394-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the level of activity in pediatric urological laparoscopy and its relationship to complications a survey of the membership of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Urology was conducted. Materials and Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to 251 pediatric urologists and 153 responses were recorded. Results: Of the respondents 75% reported performing diagnostic and operative laparoscopy (average 54 cases). Patient age ranged from newborn to 20 years. Average case load for laparoscopy was 19 of 401 total cases yearly. More than 5,400 laparoscopic cases are represented by the reported experience. Complications were reported in 5.38% of cases (average complication rate 6.06% per practitioner). Excluding preperitoneal. insufflation or subcutaneous emphysema the complication rate was 1.18%. Complications requiring surgical repair occurred in 0.39% of cases, including bowel, bladder and great vessel injury. The dearest predictor of complication rate was laparoscopic experience. The technique used to obtain pneumoperitoneum was also important in that Veress needle technique was associated with a 2.6% significant complication rate in contrast to 1.2% for open technique (p < 0.006). Conclusions: Laparoscopy is widely practiced in the pediatric urological community with a good safety record. Complications occur and important means of minimizing them are to provide for supervised experience with emphasis on the details of safe technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1070 / 1073
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications of pediatric urological laparoscopy: Mistakes and risks
    Palmer, LS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 1492 - 1492
  • [2] Medical malpractice trends in contemporary urological laparoscopy: Results of an Internet survey
    Marcovich, R
    Rastinehad, A
    El-Hakim, A
    Smith, AD
    Lee, BR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 127 - 127
  • [3] Hernia After Pediatric Urological Laparoscopy
    Cost, Nicholas G.
    Lee, Joy
    Snodgrass, Warren T.
    Harrison, Clanton B.
    Wilcox, Duncan T.
    Baker, Linda A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03): : 1163 - 1167
  • [4] Tumor seeding in urological laparoscopy: An international survey
    Micali, S
    Celia, A
    Bove, P
    De Stefani, S
    Sighinolfi, MC
    Kavoussi, LR
    Bianchi, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (06): : 2151 - 2154
  • [5] Complications of urological laparoscopy: A standardized 1 institution experience
    Thomas, R
    Steele, R
    Ahuja, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (02): : 469 - 471
  • [6] Hernia After Pediatric Urological Laparoscopy EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Casale, Pasquale
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03): : 1167 - 1167
  • [7] Urological complications in pediatric renal transplantation
    Nuininga, JE
    Feitz, WFJ
    van Dael, KCML
    de Gier, RPE
    Cornelissen, EAM
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (05) : 598 - 602
  • [8] Management of Pediatric Inguinal Hernias in the Era of Laparoscopy: Results of an International Survey
    Zani, Augusto
    Eaton, Simon
    Hoellwarth, Michael
    Puri, Prem
    Tovar, Juan
    Fasching, Guenter
    Bagolan, Pietro
    Lukac, Marija
    Wijnen, Rene
    Kuebler, Joachim
    Cecchetto, Giovanni
    Rintala, Risto
    Pierro, Agostino
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2014, 24 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [9] Complications of laparoscopic procedures after concentrated training in urological laparoscopy
    Cadeddu, JA
    Wolfe, JS
    Nakada, S
    Chen, R
    Shalhav, A
    Bishoff, JT
    Hamilton, B
    Schulam, PG
    Dunn, M
    Hoenig, D
    Fabrizio, M
    Hedican, S
    Averch, TD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06): : 2109 - 2111