Pathological lymph node involvement at surgery is a significant predictive factor of recurrence in locally advanced breast cancer treated with concomitant epirubicin-docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a cohort study

被引:6
|
作者
Kai, Kazuharu [1 ,2 ]
Arima, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Miyayama, Haruhiko [1 ]
Yamamoto, Yutaka [2 ]
Iwase, Hirotaka [2 ]
Nishimura, Reiki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto City Hosp, Kumamoto 8628505, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Fac Med & Pharmaceut Sci, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
关键词
Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Axillary lymph node; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; ADVANCED-CARCINOMA; PRIMARY TUMOR; DOXORUBICIN; METASTASES; SURVIVAL; DISEASE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-008-0055-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard therapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Recently, several studies have revealed that clearance of axillary lymph node involvement is an independent factor for survival irrespective of the response of the primary lesion. However, in daily practice, it is difficult to fully examine every lymph node that has been surgically sampled, in view of pathology laboratory workload and cost. Therefore, in the present study, we adopted the more clinically relevant categorization of evaluating postoperative axillary lymph node status and retrospectively studied its significance in predicting patients' survival. Methods The study cohort consisted of 35 locally advanced breast cancer patients who are treated with concomitant epirubicin-docetaxel. The clinicopathological factors used for analysis were as follows: ER alpha, PgR, p53, HER2, pathological response (in the primary tumor), and axillary lymph node status at surgery. With regard to axillary lymph node status, we categorized patients into two groups: those with pathological lymph node involvement at surgery (pLNI) and those without. Using multivariate analysis, we evaluated the significance of these factors in predicting disease-free survival after surgery. Results The median follow-up period was 23.4 months (range 4.3-45.4). Multivariate analysis showed significantly reduced disease-free survival associated with pLNI (P = 0.005). Conclusions pLNI is an excellent prognostic factor for locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with concomitant epirubicin-docetaxel. Use of our criteria may enable large numbers of oncologists to participate in new studies of high-risk cohorts who are refractory to NAC.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 48
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pathological lymph node involvement at surgery is a significant predictive factor of recurrence in locally advanced breast cancer treated with concomitant epirubicin–docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a cohort study
    Kazuharu Kai
    Nobuyuki Arima
    Haruhiko Miyayama
    Yutaka Yamamoto
    Hirotaka Iwase
    Reiki Nishimura
    [J]. Breast Cancer, 2009, 16
  • [2] Clinical outcome and predictive factors for docetaxel and epirubicin neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer
    Won, Hye Sung
    Kim, Yong Seok
    Kim, Jeong Soo
    Chang, Eun Deok
    Na, Sae Jung
    Whang, In Yong
    Lee, Dong Soo
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (06): : 1489 - 1496
  • [3] Docetaxel and epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).
    Alkhatib, F
    Alawadi, S
    Grohn, P
    Motawy, M
    Fayaz, S
    Patel, J
    Attia, N
    Trad, D
    Delvadia, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 : 21 - 22
  • [4] Docetaxel and high-dose epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
    E. Espinosa
    S. Morales
    P. Borrega
    A. Casas
    C. Madroñal
    I. Machengs
    J. A. Illarramendi
    J. Lizón
    J. A. Moreno
    J. Belón
    J. Janáriz
    M. de la Puente
    T. Checa
    J. R. Mel
    M. González Barón
    [J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2004, 54 : 546 - 552
  • [5] Docetaxel and high-dose epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
    Espinosa, E
    Morales, S
    Borrega, P
    Casas, A
    Madroñal, C
    Machengs, I
    Illarramendi, J
    Lizón, J
    Moreno, J
    Belón, J
    Janáriz, J
    de la Puente, M
    Checa, T
    Mel, JR
    Barón, MG
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 54 (06) : 546 - 552
  • [6] The combination of epirubicin plus docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally-advanced breast cancer
    Hirano, A
    Shimizu, T
    Imamura, H
    Watanabe, O
    Kinoshita, J
    Okabe, T
    Kimura, K
    Kamimura, M
    Domoto, K
    Aiba, M
    Ogawa, K
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 26 (1B) : 581 - 584
  • [7] Locally advanced breast cancer patients with negative pathological lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conservative surgery: Is lymph node irradiation necessary?
    Daveau, C.
    Stevens, D.
    Berges, O.
    Zilberman, S.
    Gardner, M.
    Villette, S.
    Brain, E.
    Lasry, S.
    Labib, A.
    Le Scodan, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [8] Epirubicin and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II study
    Lombardi, D.
    Scalone, S.
    Crivellari, D.
    La Mura, N.
    Miolo, G.
    Murrone, A.
    Perin, T.
    Coran, F.
    Candiani, E.
    Massarut, S.
    Veronesi, A.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 106 : S229 - S229
  • [9] Epirubicin and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II study
    Lombardi, Davide
    Scalone, Simona
    Crivellari, Diana
    Magri, Maria Donatella
    La Mura, Nicoletta
    Miolo, GianMaria
    Murrone, Antonio
    Perin, Tiziana
    Coran, Francesco
    Candiani, Ezio
    Massarut, Samuele
    Veronesi, Andrea
    [J]. TUMORI JOURNAL, 2010, 96 (02): : 229 - 233
  • [10] A Phase II Study of Concurrent Docetaxel, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide as a Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
    Yao, Xin
    Hosenpud, Janet
    Chitambar, Christopher R.
    Charlson, John
    Cheng, Yee Chung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 3 : 145 - 151