Impact of Panel Gene Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Patients

被引:84
|
作者
Lumish, Heidi S. [1 ]
Steinfeld, Hallie [1 ]
Koval, Carrie [2 ]
Russo, Donna [2 ]
Levinson, Elana [2 ]
Wynn, Julia [2 ]
Duong, James [3 ]
Chung, Wendy K. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Div Clin Genet, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Biostat, New York, NY USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Pediat, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, New York, NY 10027 USA
[6] Div Mol Genet, 1150 St Nicholas Ave,Room 620, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Genetic counseling; Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility; Breast cancer; Panel gene testing; MICRA; Cancer genetics; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; MUTATION CARRIERS; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOMES; BRCA2; MUTATIONS; RISK PERCEPTION; VARIANTS; PREDISPOSITION; WOMEN; SATISFACTION; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-017-0090-y
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Recent advances in next generation sequencing have enabled panel gene testing, or simultaneous testing for mutations in multiple genes for a clinical condition. With more extensive and widespread genetic testing, there will be increased detection of genes with moderate penetrance without established clinical guidelines and of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), or genetic variants unknown to either be disease-causing or benign. This study surveyed 232 patients who underwent genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer to examine the impact of panel gene testing on psychological outcomes, patient understanding, and utilization of genetic information. The survey used standardized instruments including the Impact of Event Scale (IES), Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA), Satisfaction with Decision Instrument (SWD), Ambiguity Tolerance Scale (AT-20), genetics knowledge, and utilization of genetic test results. Study results suggested that unaffected individuals with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer who received positive results were most significantly impacted by intrusive thoughts, avoidance, and distress. However, scores were also modestly elevated among unaffected patients with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer who received VUS, highlighting the impact of ambiguous results that are frequent among patients undergoing genetic testing with large panels of genes. Potential risk factors for increased genetic testing-specific distress in this study included younger age, black or African American race, Hispanic origin, lower education level, and lower genetic knowledge and highlight the need for developing strategies to provide effective counseling and education to these communities, particularly when genetic testing utilizes gene panels that more commonly return VUS. More detailed pre-test education and counseling may help patients appreciate the probability of various types of test results and how results would be used clinically, and allow them to make more informed decisions about the type of genetic testing to select.
引用
收藏
页码:1116 / 1129
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic impact of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
    Byfield, Stacey Dacosta
    Wei, Helen
    DuCharme, Mary
    Lancaster, Johnathan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (03) : 207 - 217
  • [2] Gene Panel Testing in Hereditary Breast Cancer
    Rostami, Parvin
    Zendehdel, Kazem
    Shirkoohi, Reza
    Ebrahimi, Elmira
    Ataei, Mitra
    Imanian, Hashem
    Najmabadi, Hossein
    Akbari, Mohammad Reza
    Sanati, Mohammad Hossein
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2020, 23 (03) : 155 - 162
  • [3] Gene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer
    Winship, Ingrid
    Southey, Melissa C.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 204 (05) : 188 - +
  • [4] Clinical impact of multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment
    Ellisen, Leif W.
    Kurian, Allison W.
    Desmond, Andrea J.
    Mills, Meredith
    Lincoln, Stephen E.
    Shannon, Kristen M.
    Gabree, Michele
    Tung, Nadine M.
    Ford, James M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [5] Hereditary cancer testing in patients with ovarian cancer using a 25-gene panel
    Langer, Lucy R.
    McCoy, Heidi
    Kidd, John
    Evans, Brent
    Brown, Krystal L.
    Saam, Jennifer
    Wenstrup, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY AND SUPPORTIVE ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14 (07): : 314 - 319
  • [6] Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in unsolved high risk breast and ovarian cancer patients
    Crawford, B. B.
    Adams, S. B.
    Sittler, T.
    Van den Akker, J.
    Chan, S. B.
    Leitner, O.
    Ryan, L. N.
    Gil, E.
    Van't Veer, L. J.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [7] Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in unsolved high-risk breast and ovarian cancer patients
    Beth Crawford
    Sophie B. Adams
    Taylor Sittler
    Jeroen van den Akker
    Salina Chan
    Ofri Leitner
    Lauren Ryan
    Elad Gil
    Laura van ’t Veer
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 163 : 383 - 390
  • [8] Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in unsolved high-risk breast and ovarian cancer patients
    Crawford, Beth
    Adams, Sophie B.
    Sittler, Taylor
    van den Akker, Jeroen
    Chan, Salina
    Leitner, Ofri
    Ryan, Lauren
    Gil, Elad
    van't Veer, Laura
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 163 (02) : 383 - 390
  • [9] Multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the province of Ontario
    Lerner-Ellis, Jordan
    Mighton, Chloe
    Lazaro, Conxi
    Watkins, Nicholas
    Di Gioacchino, Vanessa
    Wong, Andrew
    Chang, Martin C.
    Charames, George S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 147 (03) : 871 - 879
  • [10] Multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the province of Ontario
    Jordan Lerner-Ellis
    Chloe Mighton
    Conxi Lazaro
    Nicholas Watkins
    Vanessa Di Gioacchino
    Andrew Wong
    Martin C. Chang
    George S. Charames
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2021, 147 : 871 - 879