Heterogeneity derived from 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts immunotherapy outcome for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients

被引:8
|
作者
Xie, Yizhao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Cheng [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhao, Yannan [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Chengcheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Shihui [1 ,2 ]
Song, Shaoli [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hu, Xichun [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Zhongyi [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Wang, Biyun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Mol Imaging Probes, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2022年 / 11卷 / 09期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
heterogeneity; immunotherapy; PET-CT; predictors; triple-negative breast cancer; 1ST-LINE THERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; PEMBROLIZUMAB;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4522
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Recently, immunotherapy has been used to treat metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Basic research has indicated a relation between tumor heterogeneity and the immune response. Tumor heterogeneity derived from F-18-FDG PET/CT is a potential predictor of chemotherapy results; however, few studies have focused on immunotherapy. This study aims to develop a convenient and efficient measurement of tumor heterogeneity for the prediction of immunotherapy in mTNBC patients. Methods We enrolled mTNBC patients who received immunotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1 antibody) plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment and underwent F-18-FDG PET/CT scans before treatment. We defined a novel index representing tumor heterogeneity calculated from the standard uptake value (SUV) as IATH and IETH. Optimal cutoffs were determined using time-dependent receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis. Results A total of 32 patients were enrolled and analyzed in this trial. A significantly longer median PFS was observed in the low SUVmax group than in the high SUVmax group (9.4 vs. 5.8 months, HR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9, p = 0.025). The median PFS of low-IATH patients was significantly longer than that of high-IATH patients (HR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8, p = 0.022). Similarly, patients with low IETH had significantly longer PFS than patients with high IETH (9.4 vs. 4.9 months, HR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7, p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated IETH as an independent predictor of PFS. Conclusions This study proposed a novel method to assess intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity among metastatic breast cancer patients and determined that baseline IETH derived from F-18-FDG PET/CT could represent a simple and promising predictor for first-line immunotherapy among mTNBC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1948 / 1955
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pretreatment 18F-FDG Uptake Heterogeneity Predicts Treatment Outcome of First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Gong, Chengcheng
    Ma, Guang
    Hu, Xichun
    Zhang, Yingjian
    Wang, Zhonghua
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhao, Yannan
    Li, Yi
    Xie, Yizhao
    Yang, Zhongyi
    Wang, Biyun
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2018, 23 (10): : 1144 - 1152
  • [2] Correlation between 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer
    Hye Ryoung Koo
    Jeong Seon Park
    Keon Wook Kang
    Wonshik Han
    In Ae Park
    Woo Kyung Moon
    [J]. European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 3314 - 3321
  • [3] Correlation between 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer
    Koo, Hye Ryoung
    Park, Jeong Seon
    Kang, Keon Wook
    Han, Wonshik
    Park, In Ae
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (11) : 3314 - 3321
  • [4] 18F-FDG PET Derived Tumor Blood Flow Changes After 1 Cycle of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Outcome in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Humbert, Olivier
    Riedinger, Jean-Marc
    Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc
    Kanoun, Salim
    Dygai-Cochet, Inna
    Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina
    Toubeau, Michel
    Depardon, Edouard
    Lassere, Maud
    Tisserand, Simon
    Fumoleau, Pierre
    Brunotte, Francois
    Cochet, Alexandre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (11) : 1707 - 1712
  • [5] Now Is the Time to Use 18F-FDG PET/CT to Optimize Neoadjuvant Treatment in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer!
    Groheux, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (06) : 863 - 864
  • [6] Clinical utility of [18F]FDG PET/CT in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy
    Seban, R.
    Arnaud, E.
    Loirat, D.
    Cabel, L.
    Cottu, P.
    Djerroudi, L.
    Hescot, S.
    Loap, P.
    Bonneau, C.
    Bidard, F.
    Huchet, V.
    Jehanno, N.
    Berenbaum, A.
    Champion, L.
    Buvat, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (SUPPL 1) : S33 - S33
  • [7] Association between MRI Features and Standardized Uptake Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Choi, Bo Bae
    Lee, Jin Sun
    Kim, Kun Ho
    [J]. ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 41 (11) : 706 - 711
  • [8] Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    D. Groheux
    S. Giacchetti
    M. Delord
    A. de Roquancourt
    P. Merlet
    A. S. Hamy
    M. Espié
    E. Hindié
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2015, 42 : 377 - 385
  • [9] Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Groheux, D.
    Giacchetti, S.
    Delord, M.
    de Roquancourt, A.
    Merlet, P.
    Hamy, A. S.
    Espie, M.
    Hindie, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 (03) : 377 - 385
  • [10] 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Case of Metastatic Breast Cancer to the Vulva
    Guglielmo, Priscilla
    Paderno, Mariachiara
    Elisei, Federica
    Guerra, Luca
    Landoni, Claudio
    Buda, Alessandro
    Crivellaro, Cinzia
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (07) : 572 - 573