Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video

被引:817
|
作者
Seshadrinathan, Kalpana [1 ]
Soundararajan, Rajiv
Bovik, Alan Conrad [2 ]
Cormack, Lawrence K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Intel Corp, Chandler, AZ 85226 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Lab Image & Video Engn, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Full reference; human visual system; LIVE video quality database; perceptual quality assessment; video quality; visual perception; H.264/AVC; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TIP.2010.2042111
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We present the results of a recent large-scale subjective study of video quality on a collection of videos distorted by a variety of application-relevant processes. Methods to assess the visual quality of digital videos as perceived by human observers are becoming increasingly important, due to the large number of applications that target humans as the end users of video. Owing to the many approaches to video quality assessment (VQA) that are being developed, there is a need for a diverse independent public database of distorted videos and subjective scores that is freely available. The resulting Laboratory for Image and Video Engineering (LIVE) Video Quality Database contains 150 distorted videos (obtained from ten uncompressed reference videos of natural scenes) that were created using four different commonly encountered distortion types. Each video was assessed by 38 human subjects, and the difference mean opinion scores (DMOS) were recorded. We also evaluated the performance of several state-of-the-art, publicly available full-reference VQA algorithms on the new database. A statistical evaluation of the relative performance of these algorithms is also presented. The database has a dedicated web presence that will be maintained as long as it remains relevant and the data is available online.
引用
收藏
页码:1427 / 1441
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screen Content Video Quality Assessment: Subjective and Objective Study
    Cheng, Shan
    Zeng, Huanqiang
    Chen, Jing
    Hou, Junhui
    Zhu, Jianqing
    Ma, Kai-Kuang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2020, 29 (8636-8651) : 8636 - 8651
  • [2] Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Omnidirectional Video
    Lopes, Francisco
    Ascenso, Joao
    Rodrigues, Antonio
    Queluz, Maria Paula
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XLI, 2018, 10752
  • [3] An objective and subjective quality assessment study of passive gaming video streaming
    Barman, Nabajeet
    Zadtootaghaj, Saman
    Schmidt, Steven
    Martini, Maria G.
    Moeller, Sebastian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT, 2020, 30 (03)
  • [4] User-Generated Video Quality Assessment: A Subjective and Objective Study
    Li, Yang
    Meng, Shengbin
    Zhang, Xinfeng
    Wang, Meng
    Wang, Shiqi
    Wang, Yue
    Ma, Siwei
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2023, 25 : 154 - 166
  • [5] Wireless Video Quality Assessment: A Study of Subjective Scores and Objective Algorithms
    Moorthy, Anush Krishna
    Seshadrinathan, Kalpana
    Soundararajan, Rajiv
    Bovik, Alan Conrad
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) : 587 - 599
  • [6] SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF MOBILE GAMING VIDEO
    Wen, Shaoguo
    Ling, Suiyi
    Wang, Junle
    Chen, Ximing
    Jing, Yanqing
    Le Callet, Patrick
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2022, : 1810 - 1814
  • [7] Prediction of Subjective Video Quality Based on Objective Assessment
    Sevcik, L.
    Behan, L.
    Frnda, J.
    Uhrina, M.
    Bienik, J.
    Voznak, M.
    [J]. 2018 26TH TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM (TELFOR), 2018, : 96 - 99
  • [8] Video Quality Assessment: Relationship between objective and subjective methods
    Uhrina, Miroslav
    Bienik, Juraj
    Sevcik, Lukas
    Voznak, Miroslav
    [J]. 2019 27TH TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM (TELFOR 2019), 2019, : 528 - 531
  • [9] Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of the SoftCast Video Transmission Scheme
    Trioux, Anthony
    Valenzise, Giuseppe
    Cagnazzo, Marco
    Kieffer, Michel
    Coudoux, Francois-Xavier
    Corlay, Patrick
    Gharbi, Mohamed
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS AND IMAGE PROCESSING (VCIP), 2020, : 96 - 99
  • [10] Video Quality Assessment on Mobile Devices: Subjective, Behavioral and Objective Studies
    Moorthy, Anush Krishna
    Choi, Lark Kwon
    Bovik, Alan Conrad
    de Veciana, Gustavo
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 6 (06) : 652 - 671