Correlation of preoperative imaging characteristics with donor outcomes and operative difficulty in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

被引:6
|
作者
Schwartz, Fides R. [1 ]
Shaw, Brian I. [2 ]
Lerebours, Reginald [3 ]
Vernuccio, Federica [4 ]
Rigiroli, Francesca [1 ]
Gonzalez, Fernando [5 ]
Luo, Sheng [3 ]
Rege, Aparna S. [2 ]
Vikraman, Deepak [2 ]
Hurwitz-Koweek, Lynne [1 ]
Marin, Daniele [1 ]
Ravindra, Kadiyala [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Surg, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Palermo, Dept Hlth Promot Mother & Child Care Internal Med, Palermo, Italy
[5] Univ Desarrollo, Clin Alemana Santiago, Dept Radiol, Santiago, Chile
关键词
clinical research; practice; diagnostic techniques and imaging; computed tomography; donor nephrectomy; donors and donation; donor evaluation; glomerular filtration rate (GFR); health services and outcomes research; kidney transplantation; nephrology; living donor; organ transplantation in general; LIVE KIDNEY DONATION; PERINEPHRIC FAT; PERIRENAL FAT; TRANSPLANTATION; TOMOGRAPHY; ANATOMY; ERA;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.15608
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to understand the relationship of preoperative measurements and risk factors on operative time and outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Two hundred forty-two kidney donors between 2010 and 2017 were identified. Patients' demographic, anthropomorphic, and operative characteristics were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were documented before surgery, within 24 hours, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Standard radiological measures and kidney volumes, and subcutaneous and perinephric fat thicknesses were assessed by three radiologists. Data were analyzed using standard statistical measures. There was significant correlation between cranio-caudal and latero-lateral diameters (P < .0001) and kidney volume. The left kidney was transplanted in 92.6% of cases and the larger kidney in 69.2%. Kidney choice (smaller vs. larger) had no statistically significant impact on the rate of change of donor kidney function over time adjusting for age, sex and race (P = .61). Perinephric fat thickness (+4.08 minutes) and surgery after 2011 were significantly correlated with operative time (P <= .01). In conclusion, cranio-caudal diameters can be used as a surrogate measure for volume in the majority of donors. Size may not be a decisive factor for long-term donor kidney function. Perinephric fat around the donor kidney should be reported to facilitate operative planning.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 760
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: pre-operative assessment of technical difficulty
    Ratner, LE
    Smith, P
    Montgomery, RA
    Mandal, AK
    Fabrizio, M
    Kavoussi, LR
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 14 (04) : 427 - 432
  • [2] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Analysis of donor and recipient outcomes
    Koffron, A
    Herman, C
    Gross, O
    Ferrario, M
    Kaufman, D
    Abecassis, M
    Fryer, J
    Stuart, F
    Leventhal, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1111 - 1111
  • [3] Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison of outcomes
    Ruiz-Deya, G
    Cheng, S
    Palmer, E
    Thomas, R
    Slakey, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (04): : 1270 - 1273
  • [4] Determinants of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes
    Hu, Jim C.
    Liu, Chia-Hung
    Treat, Eric G.
    Ernest, Alexander
    Veale, Jeffrey
    Carter, Stacey
    Huang, Kuo-How
    Blumberg, Jeremy M.
    Schulam, Peter G.
    Gritsch, Hans A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (03) : 659 - 664
  • [5] Pure laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: Equivalent donor and recipient outcomes as compared with laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy.
    Mahanty, HD
    Carter, JT
    Kang, SM
    Roberts, JP
    Freise, CE
    Posselt, AM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 481 - 481
  • [6] Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Effect of Perirenal Fat upon Donor Operative Time
    Anderson, Kirk M.
    Lindler, Tekisha U.
    Lamberton, Gregory R.
    Baron, Pedro W.
    Ojogho, Okechukwu K.
    Baldwin, D. Duane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (10) : 2269 - 2274
  • [7] A novel difficulty grading system for laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    Kosei Takagi
    Hendrikus J. A. N. Kimenai
    Turkan Terkivatan
    Khe T. C. Tran
    Jan N. M. Ijzermans
    Robert C. Minnee
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 2889 - 2895
  • [8] A novel difficulty grading system for laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    Takagi, Kosei
    Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N.
    Terkivatan, Turkan
    Tran, Khe T. C.
    Ijzermans, Jan N. M.
    Minnee, Robert C.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (06): : 2889 - 2895
  • [9] MR angiography and preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Jha, RC
    Korangy, SJ
    Ascher, SM
    Takahama, J
    Kuo, PC
    Johnson, LB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (06) : 1489 - 1495
  • [10] Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison of outcomes - Editorial comment
    Jacobs, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (04): : 1273 - 1274