Buyer-Side Institution-Based Trust-Building Mechanisms: A 3S Framework with Evidence from Online Labor Markets

被引:6
|
作者
Hong, Zhijuan [1 ]
Zhu, Hui [2 ]
Dong, Kunxiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, 7366 East Erhuan Rd, Jinan 250014, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Informat Technol, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bidding behavior; bidding strategy; freelancer participation; institution-based mechanisms; online labor markets; trust-building mechanisms; WORD-OF-MOUTH; E-COMMERCE; PERCEIVED EFFECTIVENESS; ORGANIZATIONAL SLACK; ELECTRONIC MARKETS; MODERATING ROLE; PRICE PREMIUMS; INITIAL TRUST; MARKETPLACES; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1080/10864415.2019.1683703
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Buyer-side, institution-based trust-building mechanisms, which usually appear in the form of guarantee-required schemes, are prevalently provided by the online labor marketplace for buyers to voluntarily adopt. We integrate signaling theory and organization theories of organizational slack and contractual incompleteness to propose a 3S (screening, signaling, and slack) effect framework to explain how the adoption of buyer-side trust-building mechanisms (i.e., guarantee-required schemes) affects freelancers' participation and bidding behavior. Based on a data set from one of the leading online labor markets in China, this study finds that guarantee-required tasks attract fewer but higher-quality freelancers. Furthermore, freelancers bid shorter durations but less-detailed proposals in guarantee-required tasks. This research also examines and finds support for the moderating role of task complexity in weakening screening and slack effects. Our research complements literature on trust-building mechanisms and online labor markets by providing a new framework (i.e., 3S effect framework) and empirical evidence with large-scale observational real-life data. Our study suggests that buyers should take both the advantages (e.g., bidders with higher-quality features, bids with shorter bidding durations) and disadvantages (e.g., fewer bids, bids with less-detailed proposals) into consideration and make appropriate trade-offs when making decisions on the adoption of buyer-side trust-building mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 52
页数:39
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据