Narrow-Diameter Implants in the Anterior Region: A Meta-analysis

被引:17
|
作者
Parize, Hian Nivaldo [1 ]
Lima Bohner, Lauren Oliveira [1 ]
Gama, Lorena Tavares [1 ]
Porporatti, Andre Luis [2 ]
Mendonca Mezzomo, Luis Andre [2 ]
Martin, William Christopher [3 ]
Simek Vega Goncalves, Thais Marques [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Dent, R Engn Agron Andrei Cristian Ferreira S-N, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
alveolar bone loss; esthetics; narrow-diameter implants; review (systematic); single implant; survival analysis; MAXILLARY LATERAL INCISOR; SINGLE MISSING MAXILLARY; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; IMMEDIATE PROVISIONALIZATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; SURVIVAL RATE; CASE SERIES; CROWNS; TOOTH;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.7526
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Implants in the anterior region are challenging, and literature reporting outcomes of narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) in anterior sites is scarce. This systematic review summarized evidence of functional and esthetic performance of anterior single crowns supported by NDIs. Materials and Methods: Ten databases were searched to find studies evaluating anterior single crowns supported by NDIs. Risk of bias was assessed, and random-effects meta-analyses were applied to analyze mean differences in survival, success, and marginal bone level (MBL). The review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018089886). Results: Twenty-one studies meeting the screening criteria were included for qualitative analysis, and three for meta-analysis. A total of 892 NDIs, placed in 736 patients, were analyzed. Follow-up duration varied from 12 months to 14 years (mean: 40 months), and 16 failures (implant loss) were recorded. Fixed-effect meta-analysis (I-2 = 0%) of survival rate revealed a risk difference of 0.02 (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.08) between NDIs and controls (regular-diameter implants), without differences between groups (P = .39). Success rates ranged from 84.2% to 100% (mean: 95.2%). Random-effects meta-analysis (I-2 = 56%) of MBL indicated a mean difference of 0.02 mm (95% CI: -0.21 to 0.25), without differences between groups (P = .87). Conclusion: Single crowns supported by NDIs are a predictable treatment, since their survival rate and MBL are comparable to those supported by regular-diameter implants. Due to data shortage reporting esthetic outcomes, more studies are needed to evaluate the long-term performance of the single crowns supported by NDIs in the anterior region.
引用
收藏
页码:1347 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cruz, R. S.
    Lemos, C. A. A.
    de Batista, V. E. S.
    Yogui, F. C.
    Oliveira, H. F. F.
    Verri, F. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (05) : 674 - 682
  • [2] Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schiegnitz, Eik
    Al-Nawas, Bilal
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 : 21 - 40
  • [3] Narrow-diameter implants
    Reena Wadia
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2019, 226 (8) : 575 - 575
  • [4] Narrow-Diameter Implants for Partial Fixed and Removable Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Badaro, Mauricio Malheiros
    Herdt, Bruna
    Bezerra, Adriana Pinto
    Schimmel, Martin
    Goncalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (06) : 738 - +
  • [5] Narrow-diameter versus regular-diameter dental implants for mandibular overdentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Park, Jin-Hong
    Shin, Sang-Wan
    Lee, Jeong-Yol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 (08): : 669 - 678
  • [6] Risk factors and reoperative survival rate of failed narrow-diameter implants in the maxillary anterior region
    Yang, Guangwen
    Chen, Li
    Gao, Ying
    Liu, Hui
    Dong, Heng
    Mou, Yongbin
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (01) : 29 - 41
  • [7] Narrow-diameter implants with conical connection for restoring the posterior edentulous region
    Woo I.-H.
    Kim J.-W.
    Kang S.-Y.
    Kim Y.-H.
    Yang B.-E.
    [J]. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 38 (1)
  • [8] A prospective clinical study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of narrow-diameter threaded implants in the anterior region of the maxilla
    Andersen, E
    Saxegaard, E
    Knutsen, BM
    Haanæs, HR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2001, 16 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [9] The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis
    Ma, Meng
    Qi, Mengxing
    Zhang, Dongsheng
    Liu, Hongchen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2019, 45 (06) : 503 - 508
  • [10] Esthetic and functional outcomes of narrow-diameter implants compared in a cohort study to standard diameter implants in the anterior zone of the maxilla
    Momberger, Nicolas
    Mukaddam, Khaled
    Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula
    Bornstein, Michael
    Filippi, Andreas
    Kuhl, Sebastian
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 53 (06): : 502 - 509