Development of a Decision Aid for Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery in Transmen

被引:25
|
作者
Ozer, Mujde [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Pigot, Garry L. S. [3 ,5 ]
Bouman, Mark-Bram [1 ,2 ,5 ]
van de Grift, Tim C. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Elfering, Lian [1 ,2 ,5 ]
van Mello, Norah M. [4 ,5 ]
Al-Itejawi, Hoda H. M. [3 ]
Buncamper, Marlon E. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Mullender, Margriet G. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Ctr Expertise Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE | 2018年 / 15卷 / 07期
关键词
Transmen; Gender-Affirming Surgery; Decision Aid; Genital Surgery; LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER; TOTAL PENILE RECONSTRUCTION; ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAP; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.04.644
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: As genital gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a demanding and life-changing intervention, transmen should be able to make choices about the surgical treatment based on outcomes that are most important to them, while taking into consideration the concomitant risks involved. Aim: Develop a decision aid (DA) for genital surgery in transmen (DA-GST) that can assist both transmen and health care professionals (HCPs) in making a well-informed decision about the surgical treatment. Methods: A qualitative focus group study was performed. 5 Focus groups were organized with both HCPs and transmen. These were led by an independent professional moderator. Data collected during these focus groups were analyzed to provide content for the DA. Outcomes: To develop content for a DA-GST. Results: Data collected during the focus groups related to the treatment options, information deemed relevant by transmen, and the arguments for or against each treatment option. Collected items were divided into the following themes: outcome, quality of life, environment, sexuality, and beliefs. Clinical Implications: The tool will be useful in assisting both transmen and HCPs in the shared decision-making process regarding genital GAS by exploring which domains are most relevant for each specific individual. Strengths & Limitations: This DA was developed according to an iterative participatory design approach to fit the needs of both transmen and HCPs. Issues that transmen find important and relevant pertaining to genital GAS were translated into arguments that were incorporated in the DA-GST. The study is limited by the group that had participated. Not all arguments for or against specific surgical options may be covered by the DA-GST. Conclusion: An online DA was developed to support transmen with their decision-making process concerning all surgical options for removal of reproductive organs and genital GAS. Copyright (C) 2018, International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1048
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotics in genital gender-affirming surgery
    Weinstein, Brielle
    Govekar, Henry
    Cherullo, Edward
    Jacobs, Kristin M.
    Schechter, Loren
    [J]. PLASTIC AND AESTHETIC RESEARCH, 2023, 10
  • [2] Evaluation of the Decision Aid for Genital Surgery in Transmen
    Mokken, Sterre E.
    Ozer, Mujde
    van de Grift, Tim C.
    Pigot, Garry L.
    Bouman, Mark-Bram
    Mullender, Margriet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (10): : 2067 - 2076
  • [3] Evaluation of the decision aid for genital surgery in transmen
    Mokken, S.
    Ozer, M.
    Mullender, M.
    Van de Grift, T.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 57 - 58
  • [4] DEVELOPMENT OF A DECISION AID FOR GENITAL SURGERY IN TRANSMEN (DA-GST)
    Ozer, M.
    Bouman, M.
    Pigot, G. L. S.
    Elfering, L.
    Buncamper, M.
    Mullender, M. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (07): : S197 - S198
  • [5] Patient education and surgical decision-making in genital gender-affirming surgery
    Arteaga, Rebecca
    Dryden, Kim
    Blasdel, Gaines
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2024, 34 (05) : 308 - 313
  • [6] A Review of Insurance Coverage of Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery
    Ngaage, Ledibabari M.
    Knighton, Brooks J.
    Benzel, Caroline A.
    McGlone, Katie L.
    Rada, Erin M.
    Coon, Devin
    Bluebond-Langner, Rachel
    Rasko, Yvonne M.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (03) : 803 - 812
  • [7] Variant genital gender-affirming surgery: a systematic review
    Claeys, Wietse
    Wolff, Dylan T.
    Zachou, Alexandra
    Hoebeke, Piet
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Spinoit, Anne-Francoise
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024,
  • [8] Overview surgical techniques in gender-affirming genital surgery
    Chen, Mang L.
    Reyblat, Polina
    Poh, Melissa M.
    Chi, Amanda C.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2019, 8 (03) : 191 - 208
  • [9] Transmen's Experienced Sexuality and Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery: Findings From a Clinical Follow-Up Study
    van de Grift, Tim C.
    Pigot, Garry L. S.
    Kreukels, Baudewijntje P. C.
    Bouman, Mark-Bram
    Mullender, Margriet G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2019, 45 (03) : 201 - 205
  • [10] Masculinizing genital gender-affirming surgery: metoidioplasty and urethral lengthening
    Kocjancic, Ervin
    Acar, Omer
    Talamini, Susan
    Schechter, Loren
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (02) : 120 - 127