Single chamber atrial pacing:: A realistic option in sinus node disease:: A long-term follow-up study of 213 patients

被引:7
|
作者
Hoeijer, Carl J. [1 ]
Hoeglund, Peter
Schueller, Hans
Brandt, Johan
机构
[1] Univ Lund Hosp, Heart & Lung Div, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Lund Hosp, Competence Ctr Clin Res, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
来源
关键词
pacing; trials; CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS; MODE; PACEMAKER; FIBRILLATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00744.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite several decades of experience with atrial pacing, many centers do not apply this mode to any greater extent, mainly because of concerns for the development of future atrioventricular (AV) block or atrial fibrillation. Recent studies have emphasized possible negative effects of right ventricular stimulation, even when AV-synchrony is preserved, and have thus given rise to renewed interest in single chamber atrial pacing for sinus node disease. Methods: This study presents the results of up to 19 years' follow-up of 213 patients with sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing with respect to survival and causes of death, development of atrial fibrillation and AV block, and total mode survival. Patients were divided into two groups: with or without associated atrial tachyarrhythmias at the time of implant. Results are given for all patients and for the two groups separately. Results: The mean follow-up time was 10.1 years. The survival of the entire group was lower after 10 years than that of an age and gender-matched general Swedish population. This was caused by patients with the brady-tachy syndrome (BT) having a significantly higher mortality rate than controls, whereas those with bradycardia only (B) had survival comparable to the general population. Permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) developed in 20% of patients and was significantly more common in patients with BT. The majority of patients with AF (78%) no longer needed any pacing, i.e., did not require ventricular stimulation due to slow ventricular rate. The annual incidence of high grade AV block was 1.8%. If patients with preexisting bundle branch block were excluded, the incidence was 1.6%. No fatal episode of AV block was seen. The overall mode survival at the end of follow-up was 75%, with 155 patients still with atrial pacemakers. Conclusion: Atrial pacing is a safe and reliable mode of pacing in patients with sinus node disease, even in the very long-term.
引用
收藏
页码:740 / 747
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Atrioventricular conduction during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single chamber atrial pacing
    Nielsen, JC
    Mortensen, PT
    Thuesen, L
    Pedersen, AK
    Vesterlund, T
    Thomsen, PEB
    Andersen, HR
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 510 - 510
  • [2] Clinical safety and efficacy of single-chamber atrial pacing-in sick sinus syndrome:: Long-term follow-up
    Moriñigo, JL
    Arribas, A
    Ledesma, C
    Sánchez, PL
    Martín, F
    Luengo, CM
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2002, 55 (12): : 1267 - 1272
  • [3] A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study
    Mutagaywa, Reuben Kato
    Tumaini, Basil
    Chin, Ashley
    CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA, 2021, 32 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [4] RESULTS OF LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PERMANENT ATRIAL-PACING IN PATIENTS WITH SICK SINUS SYNDROME
    KOLK, R
    LAANE, P
    ROOSE, I
    SAMARUTEL, J
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 1994, 34 (7-8) : 5 - 7
  • [5] Prognostic value of Wenckebach point in selection of single atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome at long-term follow-up
    Makmur, J
    Arosio, E
    Mazza, S
    Bergandi, GL
    Sciuto, F
    Dalmasso, M
    EUROPACE 2001, 2001, : 631 - 636
  • [6] Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing
    Nielsen, JC
    Andersen, HR
    Thomsen, PEB
    Thuesen, L
    Mortensen, PT
    Vesterlund, T
    Pedersen, AK
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 97 (10) : 987 - 995
  • [7] LONG-TERM PACING IN SINUS NODE DISEASE - SUPERIORITY OF ATRIAL STIMULATION
    ROSENQVIST, M
    BRANDT, J
    SCHULLER, H
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 9 (02) : A10 - A10
  • [8] Long-Term Outcome of Single-Chamber Atrial Pacing Compared with Dual-Chamber Pacing in Patients with Sinus-Node Dysfunction and Intact Atrioventricular Node Conduction
    Kim, Won Ho
    Joung, Boyoung
    Shim, Jaemin
    Park, Jong Sung
    Hwang, Eui-Seock
    Pak, Hui-Nam
    Kim, Sungsoon
    Lee, Moonhyoung
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (06) : 832 - 837
  • [9] Sinus node disease and arrhythmias in the long-term follow-up of former professional cyclists
    Baldesberger, Sylvette
    Bauersfeld, Urs
    Candinas, Reto
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Zuber, Michel
    Ritter, Manfred
    Jenni, Rolf
    Oechslin, Erwin
    Luthi, Pia
    Scharf, Christop
    Marti, Bernhard
    Jost, Christine H. Attenhofer
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [10] Effectiveness of atrial versus atrioventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome during long-term follow-up
    Kuniewicz, Marcin
    Rydlewska, Anna
    Karkowski, Grzegorz
    Lelakowska-Piela, Maria
    Majewski, Jacek
    Lelakowski, Jacek
    Kardiologia Polska, 2015, 73 (01) : 7 - 16