Perineal Flap Reconstruction following Oncologic Anorectal Extirpation: An Outcomes Assessment

被引:30
|
作者
Wang, Eric D.
Conkling, Nicole
Xu, Xiaoti
Chern, Hueylan
Finlayson, Emily
Varma, Madhulika G.
Hansen, Scott L.
Foster, Robert D.
Hoffman, William Y.
Sbitany, Hani
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Colorectal Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
ABDOMINIS MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER; DEFECTS; CLOSURE; EXCISION; SURGERY; RECTUM;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000837
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The poorly healing perineal wound is a significant complication of abdominoperineal resection. The authors examined criteria for immediate flap coverage of the perineum and long-term cross-sectional surgical outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection or pelvic exenteration for anorectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, premorbid and oncologic data, surgical treatment, reconstruction method, and recovery were recorded. Outcomes of successful wound healing, surgical complications necessitating intervention (admission or return to the operating room), and progression to chronic wounds were assessed. Results: The authors identified 214 patients who underwent this procedure from 1995 to 2013. Forty-seven patients received pedicled flaps and had higher rates of recurrence and reoperation, active smoking, Crohn disease, human immunodeficiency virus, and anal cancers, and had higher American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor stages. Thirty-day complication rates were equivalent in the two groups. There were no complete flap losses or reconstructive failures. Perineal wound complication rates were marginally but not significantly higher in the flap group (55 percent versus 41 percent; p = 0.088). Infectious complications, readmissions for antibiotics, and operative revision were more frequent in the flap cohort. A larger proportion of the primary closure cohort developed chronic draining perineal wounds (23.3 versus 8.5 percent; p = 0.025). Conclusions: Immediate flap coverage of the perineum was less likely to progress to a chronic draining wound, but had higher local infectious complication rates. The authors attribute this to increased comorbidity in the selected patient population, reflecting the surgical decision making in approaching these high-risk closures and ascertainment bias in diagnosis of infectious complications with multidisciplinary examination.
引用
收藏
页码:176E / 184E
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perineal Flap Reconstruction after Oncologic Resection
    Fabbri, Erich
    Michelina, Veronica Vietti
    Villani, Riccardo
    D'Angelo, Giorgio
    Antoniazzi, Elisa
    Summo, Valeria
    Morselli, Paolo Giovanni
    Contedini, Federico
    Cipriani, Riccardo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (03)
  • [2] Perineal Flap Reconstruction after Oncologic Resection
    Fabbri, Erich
    Michelina, Veronica Vietti
    Villani, Riccardo
    D'Angelo, Giorgio
    Antoniazzi, Elisa
    Summo, Valeria
    Morselli, Paolo Giovanni
    Contedini, Federico
    Cipriani, Riccardo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2016, 4
  • [3] The gluteal fold flap: A versatile option for perineal reconstruction following anorectal cancer resection
    Pantelides, N. M.
    Davies, R. J.
    Fearnhead, N. S.
    Malata, C. M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2013, 66 (06): : 812 - 820
  • [4] Aesthetic Outcomes of Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap
    Hellinga, Joke
    Fleer, Joke
    van der Lei, Berend
    Werker, Paul M. N.
    van Etten, Boudewijn
    Stenekes, Martin W.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (06) : E3621
  • [5] Outcomes of the keystone perforator island flap for oncologic reconstruction of the back
    Yan, Maria
    Rose, Peter S.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    Moran, Steven L.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 124 (07) : 1002 - 1007
  • [6] Perineal resection and anorectal amputation with perforator flap reconstruction by a dorsal approach in prone Jackknife position
    Martinez-Gomez, Carlos
    Angeles, Martina Aida
    Martinez, Alejandra
    Meresse, Thomas
    Gangloff, Dimitri
    Ferron, Gwenael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (07) : 1082 - 1083
  • [7] Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Pelvic Perineal Reconstruction by Perineal Colostomy and Malone Procedure After Abdominoperineal Resection
    Marinho, Anthony
    Zalay, Nicolas
    Chaltiel, Leonor
    Kirzin, Sylvain
    Philis, Antoine
    Selves, Jannick
    Carrere, Nicolas
    Buscail, Etienne
    Ghouti, Laurent
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (12) : 1501 - 1510
  • [8] Oversized lotus petal flap for reconstruction of extensive perineal defects following abdomino perineal resection
    Papas, Y.
    Laurent, R.
    Efanov, I. J.
    Paek, L.
    Danino, M. A.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2022, 67 (04): : 224 - 231
  • [9] Pelvic and perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection - The role of gracilis flap
    Persichetti, Paolo
    Cogliandro, Annalisa
    Marangi, Giovanni Francesco
    Simone, Pierfranco
    Ripetti, Valter
    Vitelli, Carlo Eugenio
    Coppola, Roberto
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 59 (02) : 168 - 172
  • [10] Forehead flap nasal reconstruction: oncologic and functional outcomes in a regional centre
    Schmidt, Campbell
    Nightingale, James
    Ioannou, Curtis
    Grigg, Roger
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 4