The impact of competitive advantage on the investment timing in Stackelberg leader-follower game

被引:1
|
作者
Hoe, SingRu [1 ]
Yan, Zhongfeng [2 ]
Bensoussan, Alain [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Commerce, TX USA
[2] Jinan Univ, Dept Math, 601 Huangpu Ave, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Jindal Sch Management, Int Ctr Decis & Risk Anal, Dallas, TX USA
[4] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Sci & Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
ENGINEERING ECONOMIST | 2018年 / 63卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
REAL OPTIONS; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1080/0013791X.2017.1399186
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This short note clarifies how the Stackelberg leader's competitive advantage after the follower's entry affects the leader's optimal market entry decision and Stackelberg strategic interactions under uncertainty. Although the Stackelberg leader's first investment threshold remains constant and coincides with the monopolist's investment trigger, his second (third) investment threshold, which defines the exit (entry) of the first (second) investment interval, increases with an increased competitive advantage. With an increased competitive advantage, the probability of sequential investment equilibrium (simultaneous investment equilibrium) increases (decreases) irrespective of the level of volatility. Moreover, for a given level of competitive advantage, an increase in the volatility tends to decrease (increase) the probability of simultaneous investment equilibrium (sequential investment equilibrium). For a richer set of results, endogenous firm roles are examined and analyzed as well. The leader's preemptive threshold is negatively affected by his competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 249
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A leader-follower game in competitive facility location
    Kucukaydin, Hande
    Aras, Necati
    Altinel, I. Kuban
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (02) : 437 - 448
  • [2] Joint optimization for coordinated configuration of product families and supply chains by a leader-follower Stackelberg game
    Yang, Dong
    Jiao, Jianxin
    Ji, Yangjian
    Du, Gang
    Helo, Petri
    Valente, Anna
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 246 (01) : 263 - 280
  • [3] Leader-follower decentralized optimal control for large population hexarotors with tilted propellers: A Stackelberg game approach
    Lee, Myoung Hoon
    Ngo Phong Nguyen
    Moon, Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE-ENGINEERING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2019, 356 (12): : 6175 - 6207
  • [4] Like Leader, Like Follower: Impact of Leader-Follower Identification Transfer on Follower Outcomes
    Ishaq, Erum
    Bouckenooghe, Dave
    Zakariya, Ramsha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 657 - 670
  • [5] A leader-follower model for discrete competitive facility location
    Drezner, Tammy
    Drezner, Zvi
    Kalczynski, Pawel
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 64 : 51 - 59
  • [6] A leader-follower stochastic linear quadratic differential game
    Yong, JM
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2002, 41 (04) : 1015 - 1041
  • [7] Stackelberg Planning: Towards Effective Leader-Follower State Space Search
    Speicher, Patrick
    Steinmetz, Marcel
    Backes, Michael
    Hoffmann, Joerg
    Kuennemann, Robert
    [J]. THIRTY-SECOND AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / THIRTIETH INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE / EIGHTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 6286 - 6293
  • [8] Leader-follower dynamic game of new product diffusion
    Breton, M
    Chauny, F
    Zaccour, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1997, 92 (01) : 77 - 98
  • [9] A leader-follower partially observed, multiobjective Markov game
    Chang, Yanling
    Erera, Alan L.
    White, Chelsea C., III
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 235 (01) : 103 - 128
  • [10] On noncooperative oligopoly equilibrium in the multiple leader-follower game
    Julien, Ludovic A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 256 (02) : 650 - 662