Incremental Fairness in Two-Sided Market Platforms: On Smoothly Updating Recommendations

被引:0
|
作者
Patro, Gourab K. [1 ,2 ]
Chakraborty, Abhijnan [1 ]
Ganguly, Niloy [2 ]
Gummadi, Krishna P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Software Syst, Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Major online platforms today can be thought of as two-sided markets with producers and customers of goods and services. There have been concerns that over-emphasis on customer satisfaction by the platforms may affect the well-being of the producers. To counter such issues, few recent works have attempted to incorporate fairness for the producers. However, these studies have overlooked an important issue in such platforms - to supposedly improve customer utility, the underlying algorithms are frequently updated, causing abrupt changes in the exposure of producers. In this work, we focus on the fairness issues arising out of such frequent updates, and argue for incremental updates of the platform algorithms so that the producers have enough time to adjust (both logistically and mentally) to the change. However, naive incremental updates may become unfair to the customers. Thus focusing on recommendations deployed on two-sided platforms, we formulate an ILP based online optimization to deploy changes incrementally in. steps, where we can ensure smooth transition of the exposure of items while guaranteeing a minimum utility for every customer. Evaluations over multiple real world datasets show that our proposed mechanism for platform updates can be efficient and fair to both the producers and the customers in two-sided platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platforms
    Patro, Gourab K.
    Biswas, Arpita
    Ganguly, Niloy
    Gummadi, Krishna P.
    Chakraborty, Abhijnan
    [J]. WEB CONFERENCE 2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE (WWW 2020), 2020, : 1194 - 1204
  • [2] NGO’s in Bangladesh: Platforms in a Two-Sided Market
    Finley G.
    [J]. Atlantic Economic Journal, 2017, 45 (2) : 265 - 266
  • [3] Two-Sided Fairness in Non-Personalised Recommendations (Student Abstract)
    Mondal, Aadi Swadipto
    Bal, Rakesh
    Sinha, Sayan
    Patro, Gourab K.
    [J]. THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 15851 - 15852
  • [4] Sales Force Compensation Design for Two-Sided Market Platforms
    Bhargava, Hemant K.
    Rubel, Olivier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2019, 56 (04) : 666 - 678
  • [5] Subgroup fairness in two-sided markets
    Zhou, Quan
    Marecek, Jakub
    Shorten, Robert
    Kumar, Ashwani
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [6] Pricing Models for Crowdsourced Logistics Platforms: A Two-Sided Market Perspective
    Song, Xingshuo
    Li, Shiyong
    Liu, Hengli
    Zhao, Guoping
    [J]. SYSTEMS, 2024, 12 (04):
  • [7] Network effects in online two-sided market platforms: A research note
    Li, Shengli
    Liu, Yipeng
    Bandyopadhyay, Subhajyoti
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 49 (02) : 245 - 249
  • [8] Private contracts in two-sided platforms
    Llanes, Gaston
    Ruiz-Aliseda, Francisco
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2021, 52 (04): : 815 - 838
  • [9] Jailbreaking in closed two-sided platforms
    Liu, Yunhao
    Feng, Gengzhong
    Sun, Yangyang
    Kong, Xiangyin
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 60 (08)
  • [10] Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms
    Hagiu, Andrei
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03): : 720 - 737