Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection or Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Is an Effective and Safe Treatment for Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: A Retrospective Study

被引:17
|
作者
Baek, Il Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hosp, Seoul 150950, South Korea
关键词
STRIP BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2009.0373
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Various methods for complete endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumors have been reported. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a new method or conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in order to remove rectal carcinoid tumors completely. Materials and Methods: Between April 2004 and June 2009, 12 patients with rectal carcinoid tumors, estimated at 10 mm, more or less, in diameter, without atypical features and dissected by ESD or resected by EMR, were recruited for this analysis. The complete dissection or resection rate, complications associated with the procedure, local recurrence, and distant metastases were evaluated. Results: Twelve patients were 9 males and 3 females with a mean age of 47.6 years (range, 32-64). The patients had no complaints of carcinoid syndrome symptoms. Tumor size ranged from 5 to 13mm in diameter, with an average size of 8.8 mm, and 11 of 12 patients (92.7%) had tumors of diameter less than 10 mm. Three of 12 patients (25.0%) were treated by ESD and 9 (75.0%) by conventional EMR. All lesions, including 13-mm-sized carcinoid tumors, were histologically determined to be completely dissected or resected. There were no immediate or late complications (i.e., bleeding or perforation) after ESD or conventional EMR. Histopathologically, there was no tumor invasion beyond the submucosal layer, and all were classified as classical-type carcinoids without lymphovascular invasion. Neither local recurrence nor distant metastasis were detected during a median follow-up period of 28 months. Conclusions: In this study, ESD as a new method or conventional EMR shows promise or potential as a useful, safe procedure to dissect or resect rectal carcinoid tumors of 10 mm, more or less, in diameter. However, long-term outcome remains to be elucidated by a large-scale, prospective study.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 331
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopic submucosal dissection or conventional endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective and safe treatment for rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study
    Chun, H. B.
    Baek, I. H.
    Lee, M. S.
    Kim, H. J.
    Kim, J. B.
    Shin, S. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 24 : A105 - A105
  • [2] ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OR ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION IS AN EFFECTIVE AND SAFE TREATMENT FOR RECTAL CARCINOID TUMORS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Baek, I
    Kim, J.
    Kim, H.
    Lee, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 108 - 109
  • [3] The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection
    Lee, D. S.
    Jeon, S. W.
    Park, S. Y.
    Jung, M. K.
    Cho, C. M.
    Tak, W. Y.
    Kweon, Y. O.
    Kim, S. K.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (08) : 647 - 651
  • [4] Endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumors: conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation device
    Kim, T. O.
    Lee, S. M.
    Park, S. H.
    Lee, J. N.
    Song, G. A.
    Lee, B. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 24 : A78 - A79
  • [5] Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection with needle-knife over endoscopic mucosal resection for small rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study
    Zhou, Ping-Hong
    Yao, Li-Qing
    Qin, Xin-Yu
    Xu, Mei-Dong
    Zhong, Yun-Shi
    Chen, Wei-Feng
    Ma, Li-Li
    Zhang, Yi-Qun
    Qin, Wen-Zheng
    Cai, Ming-Yan
    Ji, Yuan
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (10): : 2607 - 2612
  • [6] Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection with needle-knife over endoscopic mucosal resection for small rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study
    Ping-Hong Zhou
    Li-Qing Yao
    Xin-Yu Qin
    Mei-Dong Xu
    Yun-Shi Zhong
    Wei-Feng Chen
    Li-Li Ma
    Yi-Qun Zhang
    Wen-Zheng Qin
    Ming-Yan Cai
    Yuan Ji
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 2607 - 2612
  • [7] Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors and comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
    Lee, Jaebum
    Lee, Eun Jung
    Lee, Doo Seok
    Lee, In Taek
    Kim, Do Sun
    Lee, Do Han
    Youk, Eui Gon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 42 - 42
  • [8] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors
    Park, Hye-Won
    Byeon, Jeong-Sik
    Park, Young Soo
    Yang, Dong-Hoon
    Yoon, Soon Man
    Kim, Kyung-Jo
    Ye, Byong Duk
    Myung, Seung-Jae
    Yang, Suk-Kyun
    Kim, Jin-Ho
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 72 (01) : 143 - 149
  • [9] Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision versus endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Zhang, Jinyan
    Liu, Ming
    Li, Hua
    Chen, Jinzhong
    Su, Hong
    Zheng, Jianwei
    Lin, Guanxia
    Lei, Xiaoyi
    [J]. CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 42 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [10] ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF RECTAL LESIONS AFTER PRIOR FAILED ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE
    Morales, Shannon J.
    Ooka, Kohtaro
    Yuen, Poi Yu Sofia
    Vareedayah, Ashley A.
    Haber, Gregory B.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB114 - AB115