Unified hazard models for risk assessment of transportation networks in a multi-hazard environment

被引:18
|
作者
Karatzetzou, Anna [1 ]
Stefanidis, Stefanos [2 ]
Stefanidou, Sotiria [1 ]
Tsinidis, Grigorios [3 ]
Pitilakis, Dimitris [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Forestry & Nat Environm, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Univ Thessaly, Dept Civil Engn, Volos, Greece
关键词
Natural hazards; Earthquakes; Floods; Multi-hazard risk assessment; Roadway networks; Bridges; Tunnels; GROUND MOTION; VULNERABILITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102960
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Transportation networks play a vital role in the economic prosperity of modern societies. Recent hazardous events in Greece, for instance, the 2021 Crete earthquake, the 2021 Thessaly earthquakes and floods, and the heavy 2019 rainfall in Crete, have revealed the vulnerability of roadway networks to natural hazards, resulting in severe physical damage and important economic and societal losses. Severe damage on bridges and tunnels of roadway networks is commonly related to the effects of multiple hazards that may act independently during their life span. However, the literature on risk assessment of the above elements commonly focuses on the effects of a single hazard, disregarding the effects of various hazards in a multi-hazard environment. In this context, there is an increasing need for a reasonable and practical evaluation of the multi-hazard risk of transportation infrastructure. Research project INFRARES (https://www.infrares.gr/) aspires to gain further insight into the risk and resilience assessment of bridges and tunnels subjected to independent and/or multiple subsequent natural hazards, proposing a comprehensive framework toward a more efficient risk assessment of the above critical transportation infrastructure components. This paper presents the first part of the framework. More specifically, a unified methodology for the development and graphic presentation of single seismic-and flood-hazard scenarios, as well as of novel multi-seismic flood hazard scenarios, are presented, providing a valuable tool for risk assessment of roadway networks for separate, combined (triggered), or subsequent hazards. The unified approach followed to develop single seismic and flood hazard scenarios is initially presented. The data required to develop such scenarios are derived from recently published and freely available data accessible via European databases; hence, allowing for a straightforward application of the proposed methodology throughout Europe. The unified approach in developing single hazard scenarios is further exploited to develop integrated seismic-flood hazard scenarios. Single and multi-hazard scenarios are graphically displayed in the form of GIS format maps, with the methodology being applied to the Greek terrain for various hazard scenarios. Recent hazard events that caused significant damage to the Greek road network are also presented to emphasize the importance of proper evaluation of natural hazards and their effects on roadway networks in multi-hazard environments. The methodology developed within this study contributes toward the generation of uniform multi-hazard scenarios for the risk assessment of various structures and networks in a multi-hazard environment.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Perception in a Multi-Hazard Environment
    Sullivan-Wiley, Kira A.
    Gianotti, Anne G. Short
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 97 : 138 - 152
  • [2] Hazard interaction analysis for multi-hazard risk assessment: a systematic classification based on hazard-forming environment
    Liu, Baoyin
    Siu, Yim Ling
    Mitchell, Gordon
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2016, 16 (02) : 629 - 642
  • [3] Approaches to Multi-Hazard Landslide Risk Assessment
    Zhang, L. M.
    Zhang, S.
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL SAFETY AND RELIABILITY: HONORING WILSON H. TANG, 2017, (286): : 312 - 323
  • [4] Progress in Multi-hazard Comprehensive Risk Assessment
    Yin, Jie
    Yin, Zhane
    Xu, Shiyuan
    Wang, Jun
    Zhong, Haidong
    [J]. CHINESE PERSPECTIVE ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2010, 13 : 33 - +
  • [5] Coastline at Risk: Methods for Multi-Hazard Assessment
    Soldati, Mauro
    Maquaire, Olivier
    Zezere, Jose Luis
    Piacentini, Daniela
    Lissak, Candide
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2011, : 335 - 339
  • [6] Volcanic risk perception and adjustment in a multi-hazard environment
    Perry, Ronald W.
    Lindell, Michael K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2008, 172 (3-4) : 170 - 178
  • [7] A Risk Assessment Method for Multi-Hazard Coupling Disasters
    He, Zhichao
    Weng, Wenguo
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2021, 41 (08) : 1362 - 1375
  • [8] A Building Classification System for Multi-hazard Risk Assessment
    Vitor Silva
    Svetlana Brzev
    Charles Scawthorn
    Catalina Yepes
    Jamal Dabbeek
    Helen Crowley
    [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, (02) : 161 - 177
  • [9] Multi-Hazard Tropical Cyclone Risk Assessment for Australia
    Do, Cameron
    Kuleshov, Yuriy
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [10] The RiskCity Training Package on Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment
    van Westen, Cees
    Woldai, Tsehaie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH, 2012, 3 (01) : 41 - 52