Reduction of secondhand tobacco smoke in public places following national smoke-free legislation in Uruguay

被引:45
|
作者
Blanco-Marquizo, Adriana [1 ]
Goja, Beatriz [2 ]
Peruga, Armando [1 ,3 ]
Jones, Miranda R. [4 ,5 ]
Yuan, Jie [5 ]
Samet, Jonathan M. [4 ,6 ]
Breysse, Patrick N. [5 ,6 ]
Navas-Acien, Ana [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Pan Amer Hlth Org, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Univ Republica, Sch Med, Montevideo, Uruguay
[3] WHO, Tobacco Free Initiat, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Inst Global Tobacco Control, Dept Epidemiol, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
FREE RESTAURANTS; FREE POLICIES; FREE BARS; EXPOSURE; WORKERS; IRELAND; SUPPORT; HEALTH; HOME; BAN;
D O I
10.1136/tc.2009.034769
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Smoke-free legislation eliminating tobacco smoke in all indoor public places and workplaces is the international standard to protect all people from exposure to secondhand smoke. Uruguay was the first country in the Americas and the first middle-income country in the world to enact a comprehensive smoke-free national legislation in March 2006. Objective To compare air nicotine concentrations measured in indoor public places and workplaces in Montevideo, Uruguay before (November 2002) and after (July 2007) the implementation of the national legislation. Methods Air nicotine concentrations were measured for 7-14 days using the same protocol in schools, a hospital, a local government building, an airport and restaurants and bars. A total of 100 and 103 nicotine samples were available in 2002 and 2007, respectively. Results Median (IQR) air nicotine concentrations in the study samples were 0.75 (0.2-1.54) mu g/m(3) in 2002 compared to 0.07 (0.0-0.20) mu g/m(3) in 2007. The overall nicotine reduction comparing locations sampled in 2007 to those sampled in 2002 was 91% (95% CI 85% to 94%) after adjustment for differences in room volume and ventilation. The greatest nicotine reduction was observed in schools (97% reduction), followed by the airport (94% reduction), the hospital (89% reduction), the local government building (86% reduction) and restaurants/bars (81% reduction). Conclusion Exposure to secondhand smoke has decreased greatly in indoor public places and workplaces in Montevideo, Uruguay, after the implementation of a comprehensive national smoke-free legislation. These findings suggest that it is possible to successfully implement smoke-free legislations in low and middle-income countries.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 234
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of Ontario Smoke-Free Legislation on Secondhand Smoke in Enclosed Public Places
    Zhang, Bo
    Bondy, Susan J.
    Chiavetta, Jo Anne
    Selby, Peter
    Ferrence, Roberta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2010, 7 (03) : 133 - 143
  • [2] Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Public Places in Greece Following the Implementation of a Smoke-Free Legislation: A 2 Year Follow-up
    Vardavas, Constantine
    Connolly, Gregory
    Behrakis, Panagiotis
    [J]. CHEST, 2013, 144 (04)
  • [3] Exposure to secondhand smoke in Finnish workplaces and compliance with national smoke-free workplace legislation
    Heloma, Antero
    Helakorpi, Satu
    Honkonen, Jarkko
    Danielsson, Petri
    Uutela, Antti
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 39 (07) : 723 - 729
  • [4] Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish pubs: the effect of smoke-free legislation
    Semple, Sean
    Creely, Karen S.
    Naji, Audrey
    Miller, Brian G.
    Ayres, Jon G.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2007, 16 (02) : 127 - 132
  • [5] Smoke-free public places in Scotland
    Kohli, HS
    [J]. NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2006, 19 (02): : 106 - 107
  • [6] Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey
    Fong, G. T.
    Hyland, A.
    Borland, R.
    Hammond, D.
    Hastings, G.
    McNeill, A.
    Anderson, S.
    Cummings, K. M.
    Allwright, S.
    Mulcahy, M.
    Howell, F.
    Clancy, L.
    Thompson, M. E.
    Connolly, G.
    Driezen, P.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2006, 15 : 51 - 58
  • [7] The triumph of national smoke-free legislation
    Pell, Jill P.
    Haw, Sally
    [J]. HEART, 2009, 95 (17) : 1377 - 1379
  • [8] The Impact of Smoke-Free Legislation in Ontario on Levels of Second Hand Smoke in Enclosed Public Places
    Zhang, B.
    Bondy, S.
    Ferrence, R.
    Chiavetta, J.
    Selby, P.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) : S350 - S350
  • [9] Tobacco smoke exposure in public places and workplaces after smoke-free policy implementation: a longitudinal analysis of smoker cohorts in Mexico and Uruguay
    Thrasher, James F.
    Nayeli Abad-Vivero, Erika
    Sebrie, Ernesto M.
    Barrientos-Gutierrez, Tonatiuh
    Boado, Marcelo
    Yong, Hua Hie
    Arillo-Santillan, Edna
    Bianco, Eduardo
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2013, 28 (08) : 789 - 798
  • [10] Tobacco Use, Secondhand Smoke, and Smoke-Free Home Rules in Multiunit Housing
    Nguyen, Kimberly H.
    Gomez, Yessica
    Homa, David M.
    King, Brian A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (05) : 682 - 692