Neuroscience Education Making It Relevant to Psychiatric Training

被引:1
|
作者
Cooper, Joseph J. [1 ]
Walker, Ashley E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Community Med, Dept Psychiat, 4502 East 41st St, Tulsa, OK 74135 USA
关键词
Neuroscience; Education; Psychiatry; Neuropsychiatry; CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE; PHYSICAL-EXAMINATIONS; NOMENCLATURE NBN; INTEGRATING NEUROSCIENCE; ATTITUDES; NEUROPSYCHIATRY; CURRICULUM; RESIDENTS; EEG;
D O I
10.1016/j.psc.2020.12.008
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Modern medicine is grounded in the scientific application of evidence-based treatments that target the pathophysiology of disease. Yet, in psychiatry we have struggled to move past a dualistic separation of mind from brain, and to embrace our identity as a clinical neuroscience discipline.1 As a product of this implicit dualism, our educational systems have treated neuroscience as, at most, a topic among many others given an hourly didactic slot for an academic quarter or so. To truly join our colleagues in modern medicine, we must integrate a neuroscience perspective into all aspects of psychiatric education and practice. However, barriers to the integration of neuroscience perspectives remain (Table 1). Much of clinical psychiatry today involves making evidence-based decisions based on clinical symptom checklists, all of which can be done without bringing attention to the underlying pathophysiology. In other medical fields, this type of practice is theoretically possible (eg, the prescription of antiarrhythmic agents for a particular cardiac syndrome without being able to consider the electrical circuitry of the heart), but would
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 307
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条