Patient-Reported Mobility: A Systematic Review

被引:18
|
作者
Pinto-Carral, Arrate [1 ]
Fernandez-Villa, Tania [2 ]
Molina de la Torre, Antonio Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leon, Sch Hlth Sci, SALBIS Res Grp, Ave Astorga S-N, Ponferrada 24401, Leon, Spain
[2] Univ Leon, Res Grp Gene Environm Interact & Hlth GIIGAS, Ponferrada 24401, Leon, Spain
来源
关键词
Disability evaluation; Mobility limitation; Outcome assessment (health care); Patient outcome assessment; Physical therapy specialty; Rehabilitation; MEASURING ACTIVITY LIMITATIONS; LOWER-EXTREMITY DISORDERS; SELF-REPORT INSTRUMENT; LATE-LIFE FUNCTION; OUTCOME MEASURES; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; BACK-PAIN; DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRES; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; HIERARCHICAL SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.025
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify the self-administered instruments to assess mobility in adults with disability, to link the mobility assessed by these instruments to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and to evaluate their methodological quality. Data Sources: Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to July 2015. Study Selection: Studies on the development and validation of self-administered questionnaires in which at least half of the items were related to movement or mobility were included. Data Extraction: The mobility assessed by the instruments was classified according to the ICF categories. The methodological quality was assessed according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist. Data Synthesis: Of 5791 articles, 34 studies were eligible for inclusion. Only 10 of the instruments contained items that exclusively assessed mobility. The most frequently linked ICF categories were "changing basic body position" (19.4%), "walking" (14.8%), and "moving around" (13.5%). Measurement properties evaluated included internal consistency (5 studies), reliability (5 studies), measurement error (1 study), content validity (9 studies), structural validity (4 studies), hypotheses testing (6 studies), and responsiveness (1 study). Only content validity obtained the highest quality, probably because the studies included in the review reported the development and initial validation of the instruments. Conclusions: Self-administered mobility questionnaires published in the scientific literature assess mobility activities rather than functions related to movement, and do so from the perspective of disability, frequently including self-care and domestic life as domains for assessment. The instruments that presented the highest methodological quality were the Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log, the Movement Ability Measure, and the Mobility Activities Measure for Inpatient Rehabilitation Settings. (C) 2016 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:1182 / 1194
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determinants of patient-reported functional mobility in people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review
    Hanff, Anne-Marie
    Pauly, Claire
    Pauly, Laure
    Rauschenberger, Armin
    Leist, Anja K.
    Krueger, Rejko
    Zeegers, Maurice P.
    McCrum, Christopher
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2024, 108 : 97 - 109
  • [2] Patient-reported outcomes for keloids: a systematic review
    Tan, Andrea
    Glass, Donald A., II
    [J]. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI DERMATOLOGIA E VENEREOLOGIA, 2019, 154 (02): : 148 - 165
  • [3] Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: A systematic review
    Waljee, Jennifer
    McGlinn, Evan P.
    Sears, Erika Davis
    Chung, Kevin C.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2014, 155 (05) : 799 - 808
  • [4] Patient-reported assessment of compassion in Spanish: a systematic review
    Soto-Rubio, Ana
    Picazo, Carmen
    Gil-Julia, Beatriz
    Andreu-Vaillo, Yolanda
    Perez-Marin, Marian
    Sinclair, Shane
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Allison Worth
    Victoria Hammersley
    Rebecca Knibb
    Bertine Flokstra-de-Blok
    Audrey DunnGalvin
    Samantha Walker
    Anthony E J Dubois
    Aziz Sheikh
    [J]. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 24
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    [J]. ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    [J]. NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [9] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review
    Mishra, Eleanor K.
    Stanton, Andrew
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [10] Individualised patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review
    Gangannagaripalli, Jaheeda
    Porter, Ian
    Bradley, Daniela G.
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    Valderas, Jose M.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 68 - 69