Response of Savanna fire regimes to changing fire-management policies in a large African National Park

被引:195
|
作者
Van Wilgen, BW
Govender, N
Biggs, HC
Ntsala, D
Funda, XN
机构
[1] CSIR, Div Water Environm & Forestry Technol, ZA-7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Sci Serv, ZA-1350 Skukuza, South Africa
关键词
grass fuels; Kruger National Park; natural fires; prescribed burning; rainfall; South Africa;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00362.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Approaches to fire management in the savanna ecosystems of the 2-million ha Kruger National Park, South Africa, have changed several times over the past six decades. These approaches have included regular and flexible prescribed burning on fixed areas and a policy that sought to establish a lightning-dominated fire regime. We sought to establish whether changes in management induced the desired variability in fire regimes over a large area. We used a spatial database of information on all fires in the park between 1957 and 2002 to determine elements of the fire regime associated with each management policy. The area that burned in any given year was independent of the management approach and was strongly related to rainfall (and therefore grass fuels) in the preceding 2 years. On the other hand, management did affect the spatial heterogeneity of fires and their seasonal distribution. Heterogeneity was higher at all scales during the era of prescribed burning, compared with the lightning-fire interval. The lightning-fire interval also resulted in a greater proportion (72% vs 38%) of the area burning in the dry season. Mean fire-return intervals varied between 5.6 and 7.3 years, and variability in fire-return intervals was strongly influenced by the sequencing of annual rainfall rather than by management. The attempt of creating a lightning-dominated fire regime failed because most fires were ignited by humans, and the policy has been replaced by a more pragmatic approach that combines flexible prescribed with lightning-ignited fires.
引用
收藏
页码:1533 / 1540
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An evaluation of contemporary savanna fire regimes in the Canastra National Park, Brazil: Outcomes of fire suppression policies
    Luciano Batista, Eugenia Kelly
    Russell-Smith, Jeremy
    Franca, Helena
    Cortes Figueira, Jose Eugenio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 205 : 40 - 49
  • [2] PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR FIRE-MANAGEMENT POLICIES
    CORTNER, HJ
    ZWOLINSKI, MJ
    CARPENTER, EH
    TAYLOR, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1984, 82 (06) : 359 - 361
  • [3] Response of African savanna ants to long-term fire regimes
    Parr, CL
    Robertson, HG
    Biggs, HC
    Chown, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2004, 41 (04) : 630 - 642
  • [4] Modeling variability in the fire response of an endangered bird to improve fire-management
    Verdon, Simon James
    Watson, Simon J.
    Clarke, Michael F.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (08)
  • [5] The influence of proximity to a national forest on emotions and fire-management decisions
    Vining, Joanne
    Merrick, Melinda S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 41 (02) : 155 - 167
  • [6] The Influence of Proximity to a National Forest on Emotions and Fire-Management Decisions
    Joanne Vining
    Melinda S. Merrick
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2008, 41 : 155 - 167
  • [7] COMPUTER-SIMULATION OF THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF BRUSHLAND FIRE-MANAGEMENT POLICIES
    BONNICKSEN, TM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1980, 4 (01) : 35 - 47
  • [8] Changing the fire management regime in the renosterveld and lowland fynbos of the Bontebok National Park
    Kraaij, T.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2010, 76 (03) : 550 - 557
  • [9] How changing fire management policies affect fire seasonality and livelihoods
    Humphrey, Glynis Joy
    Gillson, Lindsey
    Ziervogel, Gina
    [J]. AMBIO, 2021, 50 (02) : 475 - 491
  • [10] How changing fire management policies affect fire seasonality and livelihoods
    Glynis Joy Humphrey
    Lindsey Gillson
    Gina Ziervogel
    [J]. Ambio, 2021, 50 : 475 - 491