The Importance of Financial Metrics in Physician Funding and Performance Evaluation

被引:3
|
作者
Patrinely, J. Randall
Walker, Sallie H.
Glassman, Gabriella E.
Davis, Matthew J.
Abu-Ghname, Amjed
Khan, Umraz
Drolet, Brian C.
Forte, Antonio J.
Perdikis, Galen
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Management, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Div Plast Surg, Michael E DeBakey Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Charing Cross Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, London, England
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Plast Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
INDICATORS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000007882
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Financial key performance indicators are often used to evaluate performance. Understanding of key performance indicators can be crucial for career advancement and bargaining leverage in resource negotiations. This study aimed to identify the most important key performance indicators used in surgical funding requests and understand how to use these metrics in clinical practice. Methods: In two tertiary medical centers, funding requests for surgeon gap support (2019 to 2020) and equipment (2017 to 2019) within departments of surgery were reviewed. The requesting department, approval status, and amount allotted were recorded. In requests for gap support, projections for contribution margin, operating room volume, charges, collections, and relative value units were tracked. Projected contribution margin and cost savings were recorded for equipment funding requests. Results: There were 40 gap support and 24 equipment requests, and all were approved. Most gap support requests included collections (90.0 percent), charges (87.5 percent), operating room cases (80.0 percent), relative value units (77.5 percent), and hospital contribution margin (77.5 percent). The most represented departments were general surgery (37.5 percent), neurosurgery (22.5 percent), and plastic surgery (15.0 percent). The departments that submitted the most equipment requests were general surgery (28.0 percent) and neurosurgery (28.0 percent). Most requests included projections for contribution margin (95.8 percent) and cost savings (87.4 percent). Projected hospital contribution margin correlated with the amount of funds allotted for surgeon support (r = 0.409; p = 0.022). Conclusions: This multicenter study identified the importance of using key performance indicators for a successful financial outcome in funding requests. In addition, the authors demonstrate the need for surgeons to understand their own key performance indicators. Surgeons should advocate for increased transparency to better understand their financial contributions and performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1213 / 1218
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public Performance Metrics: Driving Physician Motivation and Performance
    Jen, Maxwell Y.
    Han, Vy
    Bennett, Kathryn
    Rudkin, Scott E.
    Wong, Andrew C.
    Barton, Erik D.
    Goubert, Ronald
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (02) : 247 - 251
  • [2] EVALUATING THE IMPORTANCE OF FINANCIAL AND NON-FINANCIAL INDICATORS FOR THE EVALUATION OF COMPANY'S PERFORMANCE
    Kotane, Inta
    [J]. MANAGEMENT THEORY AND STUDIES FOR RURAL BUSINESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 37 (01): : 80 - 94
  • [3] Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance
    Gupta, Sunil
    Zeithaml, Valarie
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2006, 25 (06) : 718 - 739
  • [4] Physician Performance Measurement The Importance of Understanding Physician Behavior
    Drozda, Joseph P., Jr.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (15) : 1444 - 1446
  • [5] The Political Importance of Financial Performance
    Pond, Amy
    Zafeiridou, Christina
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 64 (01) : 152 - 168
  • [6] The Financial Benefits and Burdens of Performance Funding in Higher Education
    Hagood, Lori Prince
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2019, 41 (02) : 189 - 213
  • [7] It is not all about performance: Importance of the funding formula in the allocation of performance-based research funding in England
    Pinar, Mehmet
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2020, 29 (01) : 100 - 119
  • [8] Questioning the Metrics for Performance Evaluation
    Crow, M. L.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-11, 2008, : 5245 - 5246
  • [9] CLIENT EVALUATION OF PHYSICIAN PERFORMANCE
    KISCH, AI
    REEDER, LG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1969, 10 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [10] THE APPLICABILITY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL METRICS IN EVALUATING PURHASING PERFORMANCE
    Svandova, Eva
    Suchanek, Petr
    [J]. SGEM 2015: POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, VOL II: FINANCE, ECONOMICS & TOURISM, 2015, : 419 - 426