High-risk ED patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage undergoing emergency or urgent endoscopy: a retrospective analysis

被引:59
|
作者
Tai, Chi-Ming
Huang, Shih-Pei
Wang, Hsiu-Po
Lee, Tsung-Chun
Chang, Chi-Yang
Tu, Chia-Hung
Lee, Ching-Tai
Chiang, Tsung-Hsien
Lin, Jaw-Town
Wu, Ming-Shiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[3] Ishou Univ, Dept Internal Med, E Da Hosp, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Yunlin Branch, Yunlin 640, Taiwan
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2006.07.014
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: The optimal timing of interventional endoscopy within the initial 24 hours remains controversial. We designed a retrospective study to compare the outcomes between emergency endoscopy (EE) and urgent endoscopy (UE) for high-risk patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting to the emergency department (ED). Methods: The medical records of 189 patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage who underwent endoscopy within 24 hours of admission to the ED were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: EE group (<8 hours) or UE group (8-24 hours). We compared the endoscopic findings, hemostatic procedures, rate of hemostasis, rebleeding, need for transfusion, length of hospitalization, and mortality between the 2 groups. Results: There were 88 patients (47%) in the EE group and 101 patients (53%) in the UE group. Ulcers with active bleeding or exposed vessel were found more frequently in the EE group than in the UE group (19% vs 8%.. P = .01. 34% vs 12%, P < .001). Fifty patients had blood retention in the stomach, especially in the EE group (40% vs 15%, P < .001). Forty-four (50%) patients in the EE group and 21 (21%) patients in the UE group received endoscopic interventions. Combination modalities of endoscopic hemostasis were more commonly used in the EE group than in the UE group (40% vs 15%, P < .001). Primary hemostasis was achieved at a rate of 95% in both groups. There was no statistical difference regarding the rate of recurrent bleeding, total amount of transfusion, length of hospital stay, and mortality rate in both groups. Conclusions: Although more active lesions were detected and more therapeutic attempts were performed in the EE group, the outcome showed no difference in both groups. Emergency endoscopy performed less than 8 hours after arrival to the ED showed no definite benefit in comparison with UE performed within 8 to 24 hours. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urgent Endoscopy in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis
    Jia-lun Guan
    Ying-ying Han
    Dan Fang
    Mu-ru Wang
    Ge Wang
    De-an Tian
    Pei-yuan Li
    Current Medical Science, 2022, 42 : 856 - 862
  • [2] Urgent Endoscopy in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis
    Guan, Jia-lun
    Han, Ying-ying
    Fang, Dan
    Wang, Mu-ru
    Wang, Ge
    Tian, De-an
    Li, Pei-yuan
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 42 (04) : 856 - 862
  • [3] Timing of endoscopy in high-risk patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Corbett, G. D.
    Cameron, E. A. B.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (10) : 925 - 925
  • [4] Outcomes and Role of Urgent Endoscopy in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Cho, Soo-Han
    Lee, Yoon-Seon
    Kim, Youn-Jung
    Sohn, Chang Hwan
    Ahn, Shin
    Seo, Dong-Woo
    Kim, Won Young
    Lee, Jae Ho
    Lim, Kyoung Soo
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 16 (03) : 370 - 377
  • [5] Timing of endoscopy in high-risk patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding Reply
    Lim, L. G.
    Chan, Y. H.
    Ho, K. Y.
    Yeoh, K. G.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (10)
  • [6] Urgent endoscopy is associated with lower mortality in high-risk but not low-risk nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Lim, L. G.
    Ho, K. Y.
    Chan, Y. H.
    Teoh, P. L.
    Khor, C. J. L.
    Lim, L. L.
    Rajnakova, A.
    Ong, T. Z.
    Yeoh, K. G.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (04) : 300 - 306
  • [7] The role of rapid endoscopy for high-risk patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Targownik, Laura E.
    Murthy, Sanjay
    Keyvani, Leila
    Leeson, Shauna
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 21 (07): : 425 - 429
  • [8] Application of emergency endoscopy in patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Zheng, Fengping
    Lin, Xianyi
    Guo, Yunwei
    Tao, Li
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 122 - 122
  • [9] Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding - risk factors and the value of emergency endoscopy
    Wierzchowski, Pawel
    Dabrowiecki, Stanislaw
    Szczesny, Wojciech
    Szmytkowski, Jakub
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 9 (05) : 843 - 848
  • [10] Identifying high-risk patients undergoing urgent and emergency surgery
    Neary, W. D.
    Foy, C.
    Heather, B. P.
    Earnshaw, J. J.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2006, 88 (02) : 151 - 156